Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 03:30:23
Server time: 20:29:36, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): Archangel_1 | FireboyUK | friedrich3 | Liu Che | reformist2024 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National Pension Scheme Act of 2856 (NPS Act)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberaldemokratische Allianz

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2856

Description[?]:

The Christliche Liberalen Allianz propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Imperial Crownlands of Greater Hulstria.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:14:14, November 30, 2009 CET
FromLiberaldemokratische Allianz
ToDebating the National Pension Scheme Act of 2856 (NPS Act)
MessageThe additional 15 billion crowns a year for HSS would go towards the increased costs of a mandatory pension system.

Date03:16:58, November 30, 2009 CET
FromKonstitutionelle Monarchie Partei
ToDebating the National Pension Scheme Act of 2856 (NPS Act)
MessageAgainst; while the FAP this is for the public-private pension system, we can not blow our surplus away every time it hits double digits. The FAP suggests we let the budget grow till about 25-30 billion crowns where we will be able to do one budget including health spending (yet again) and the my proposed High-Tech R&D Act. The last budget (before the restored Agriculture/Science spending) spent nearly all our surplus yet in the past four years, it has grown to 15 billion, if we wait another 4, we'd have enough crowns to do these projects.

Date03:22:49, November 30, 2009 CET
FromLiberaldemokratische Allianz
ToDebating the National Pension Scheme Act of 2856 (NPS Act)
MessageThere is no reason for such surplus growth. The surplus doesn't do anything. It is money being piled up each year with no outlet (ie not allocated for spending). Since 2842 alone Hulstria has accumulated a cash reserve of 523,147,427,900 crowns. If the Diet does not spend tax revenue it just sits there, completely unused. It is capital needlessly flowing out of our economy, stunting our economic growth.

There is no reason to allow large surplus to build up each year. When budgets are increased, it's only cutting into what will have been the surplus for that year - it does nothing to the hundreds of billions of crowns that have resulted from previous surpluses.

Date03:24:25, November 30, 2009 CET
FromKonstitutionelle Monarchie Partei
ToDebating the National Pension Scheme Act of 2856 (NPS Act)
MessageAlso, if there must be another increase for health, which if the proposed spending for a pension system goes through, in the past 3 years Hulstria has spent over 70 billion crowns on Health & Social Services alone. When the FAP proposed a 46 billion crown increase for Infrastructure & Transport in 2815, the CLA had the FAP pledge not to increase that Ministry by more than 5 billion crowns until 2840 (25 years). Will the CLA perform a similar pledge?

Date03:27:45, November 30, 2009 CET
FromLiberaldemokratische Allianz
ToDebating the National Pension Scheme Act of 2856 (NPS Act)
MessageIf passed the CLA will not introduce any proposals to increase Health and Social Services spending until 2870.

Date12:26:19, November 30, 2009 CET
FromVerfassungs Unabhängigkeit Partei
ToDebating the National Pension Scheme Act of 2856 (NPS Act)
Messagethe VP will supprout this bill, it is rightous.

Date13:23:37, November 30, 2009 CET
FromChristliche Zentrumspartei (CDV)
ToDebating the National Pension Scheme Act of 2856 (NPS Act)
MessageAs promised, the CZP would support such a bill now that the funds have been found.

Date21:02:46, November 30, 2009 CET
FromLiberal-Demokratische Partei
ToDebating the National Pension Scheme Act of 2856 (NPS Act)
MessageAlthough it's a great idea, and es people a secured pension, we also do believe in the voluntary choice people have to choose their own way of pension system. Every individual have the right to choose between a public and a private system. Besides, if you install a compulsory public pension system, who says it will be a good and effective system? And is the government able to make the pesions reasonable and high?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 602

no
  

Total Seats: 123

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation.

Random quote: "To the youth of America, I say, beware of being trivialized by the commercial culture that tempts you daily. I hear you saying often that you're not turned on by politics. The lessons of history are clear and portentous. If you do not turn onto politics, politics will turn on you." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 72