We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Improvement of Environmental Programs Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2861
Description[?]:
The Faschistische Gewalt-Partei propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Imperial Crownlands of Greater Hulstria. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ministry | Current Budget | Old Budget | Propesed Budget |
Head of Government | 2,000,000,000 HCR | 80,000 HCR | 80,000 HCR |
Foreign Affairs | 12,500,000,000 HCR | 2,000,000,000 HCR | 2,000,000,000 HCR |
Internal Affairs | 35,000,000,000 HCR | 178,000,000,000 HCR | 178,000,000,000 HCR |
Finance | 10,000,000,000 HCR | 1,000,000,000 HCR | 1,000,000,000 HCR |
Defence | 80,000,000,000 HCR | 100,000,000,000 HCR | 100,000,000,000 HCR |
Justice | 12,500,000,000 HCR | 70,000,000,000 HCR | 70,000,000,000 HCR |
Infrastructure and Transport | 35,000,000,000 HCR | 260,000,000,000 HCR | 260,000,000,000 HCR |
Health and Social Services | 50,000,000,000 HCR | 290,000,000,000 HCR | 290,000,000,000 HCR |
Education and Culture | 40,000,000,000 HCR | 495,000,000,000 HCR | 495,000,000,000 HCR |
Science and Technology | 25,000,000,000 HCR | 64,000,000,000 HCR | 64,000,000,000 HCR |
Food and Agriculture | 15,000,000,000 HCR | 64,000,000,000 HCR | 64,000,000,000 HCR |
Environment and Tourism | 15,000,000,000 HCR | 18,000,000,000 HCR | 21,000,000,000 HCR |
Trade and Industry | 25,000,000,000 HCR | 42,500,000,000 HCR | 42,500,000,000 HCR |
Total | 357,000,000,000 HCR | 1,584,500,080,000 HCR | 1,587,500,080,000 HCR |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 02:16:38, December 07, 2009 CET |
From | Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei | To | Debating the Improvement of Environmental Programs Act | Message | The Improvement of Environmental Programs Act proposes to increase the spending for the Ministry of Environment and Tourism by 3 billion crowns to improve and give much needed funding on current programs under the E&T Ministry, such as though not limited to Greater Hulstria's national park system, the federally funded recycling program, and the government's program to dispose of residential waste. |
Date | 19:29:36, December 07, 2009 CET |
From | Liberal-Demokratische Partei | To | Debating the Improvement of Environmental Programs Act | Message | Offcourse we will support a better environment... but the LDP wants to know details! An increase in budgets doesn't always mean better quality. We want to know if this money is really neccesairy or that we can improve the environment quality without increases the E&T budget.... |
Date | 20:15:14, December 07, 2009 CET |
From | Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei | To | Debating the Improvement of Environmental Programs Act | Message | E&T has not had in increase at all in this century nor during the last half of the last century; as far as the FAP can remember, Environment has remained at a 18 billion crown level while our populations have increased. As the law stands, E&T handles the disposal of residential waste and funds a national recycling program for public use. The FAP does not believe that the E&T can properly carry out these programs with a small budget; the 3 billion is intended to make improvements and the improve the quality of these programs. |
Date | 20:16:27, December 07, 2009 CET |
From | Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei | To | Debating the Improvement of Environmental Programs Act | Message | As for other ways LDP, we could encourage better environmental standards concerning population and create new green programs, perhaps on the local level. Though if these were to be funded by the government, would it not require an increase of some kind in the budget? |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
Vote |
Seats |
yes | Total Seats: 375 |
no | Total Seats: 0 |
abstain | Total Seats: 350 |
Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
Random quote: "It only takes 20 years for a liberal to become a conservative without changing a single idea." - Robert Anton Wilson |