We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Our enviorment should be the priority of homeland security
Details
Submitted by[?]: Grand Ol' Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2861
Description[?]:
| Terrorist or the Armegedon due to polution, which sounds worse? |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of exotic animals.
Old value:: Everyone may keep exotic animals, but the trade in exotic animals is regulated by the government.
Current: Only zoos or zoological institutions are allowed to keep exotic animals.
Proposed: Only zoos or zoological institutions are allowed to keep exotic animals.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning farm size.
Old value:: Farm size is not regulated.
Current: Farms that grow too large are broken up and the land redistributed.
Proposed: Farm size regulations are determined by local governments.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Current: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Proposed: Forests have strictly enforced protection. Felling is limited to fire breaks.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Government policy regarding a national park system.
Old value:: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Current: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Proposed: The government devolves park policy to local governments.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Current: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Proposed: The nation shall never produce or store nuclear weaponry for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Article 6
Proposal[?] to change Regulation of the quality of drinking water.
Old value:: The government sets a range of standards dependant on water usage. (grey water regulation, etc.)
Current: The government sets a single standard to ensure all tap water is drinkable.
Proposed: Local government is responsible for drinking water quality regulation.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:06:29, December 08, 2009 CET | From | Christian Democrats | To | Debating the Our enviorment should be the priority of homeland security |
| Message | We only support article 5 ("The government devolves park policy to local governments.") |
| Date | 18:13:02, December 08, 2009 CET | From | Democratic Capitalist Delegation | To | Debating the Our enviorment should be the priority of homeland security |
| Message | Indeed, as the Christian Democrats have stated, only Article V is acceptable to our party. Jennifer Brackett Chairwoman Democratic Capitalist Delegation |
| Date | 22:46:26, December 08, 2009 CET | From | Aggressive Communist Party | To | Debating the Our enviorment should be the priority of homeland security |
| Message | We don't like #5 and can go both ways for #4 |
| Date | 19:07:50, December 09, 2009 CET | From | Grand Ol' Party | To | Debating the Our enviorment should be the priority of homeland security |
| Message | Sorry but we cannot water down this bill that much. We will accept it if you dont agree |
| Date | 21:52:08, December 09, 2009 CET | From | Aggressive Communist Party | To | Debating the Our enviorment should be the priority of homeland security |
| Message | we can't do anything because of the 1st article |
| Date | 23:12:33, December 09, 2009 CET | From | Progressive Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Our enviorment should be the priority of homeland security |
| Message | "Sorry but we cannot water down this bill that much." Why can't you water the bill down? You have heard that the largest party in Telamon would vote yes to article 5. Why not cut out the other articles in the name of progress? You get more visibility passing 1 article, than you do voting yes to a bill that goes down in Parliament. |
| Date | 01:20:28, December 11, 2009 CET | From | Grand Ol' Party | To | Debating the Our enviorment should be the priority of homeland security |
| Message | wait you do? |
| Date | 01:20:46, December 11, 2009 CET | From | Grand Ol' Party | To | Debating the Our enviorment should be the priority of homeland security |
| Message | i thot its all about proposals!!!!! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 500 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer". |
| Random quote: "The proletarians of the world have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Workers of all countries: unite!" - Karl Marx |