We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Woman's Right To Fight Removal
Details
Submitted by[?]: Fortunato's Fascist Formation
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2871
Description[?]:
| This bill see that the woman's right to fight alongside men is reduced to an non-battle post. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Women in the military.
Old value:: Women serve alongside men.
Current: Women serve alongside men.
Proposed: Women can only serve in non-battle positions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:40:05, December 19, 2009 CET | From | Fortunato's Fascist Formation | To | Debating the Woman's Right To Fight Removal |
| Message | Our parties view are that we men are physically stronger than women and and are mentally equipped to fight in a warzone. I believe that we should once again assert masculine dominance that our men must not need to depend on women and send a message to the rest of the world that Hutorian are predominantly stronger. WE ARE THE MASTER RACE! |
| Date | 06:26:41, December 28, 2009 CET | From | House Lusk-Nat'l Syndicalist Party (UM) | To | Debating the Woman's Right To Fight Removal |
| Message | This land is under the hegemony of the Hutors, a people of mixed Luthori and Mashacara ancestry, with substantial Dutch/Vanukuese and Jewish/Beityenuese minorities. Racial theories won't go over here too well-- not even the Saiserists were insane enough to racialize the country. |
| Date | 08:32:24, December 28, 2009 CET | From | Fortunato's Fascist Formation | To | Debating the Woman's Right To Fight Removal |
| Message | I still don't see how women are mentally strong enough to cope with difficult terrain, rape and torture. |
| Date | 15:55:26, December 28, 2009 CET | From | God's and the King's Fighters | To | Debating the Woman's Right To Fight Removal |
| Message | We'd say that the Saiserists insanity was on a whole other level than simple nationalism, but we won't stand for this degrading law. |
| Date | 03:28:02, December 31, 2009 CET | From | The Worker's Reform Party | To | Debating the Woman's Right To Fight Removal |
| Message | Hmm. I point to the simple fact that women are inferior to men physically to justify this law. This law would protect the strength and integrity of the Hutori army. Women can simply not cope with the physical demands placed on them during combat, which can place our soldiers and nation at risk. If you do not value the safety of the nation, go ahead and vote against this bill. But if you wish to protect this nation, you must sometimes do what is not necessarily popular. A great man once said "I'd rather be right then be President." Another once said "What's best is often not the most popular." Be strong, my friends, and stand against the democratic tyranny imposed upon you by the LCP. You do not have to always vote with them. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 102 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 186 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 103 |
| Random fact: In your Message Centre there is a really useful feature which allows you to subscribe to all of the bill debates in your nation. If you use that, then the "Watched Discussions" section will show you every time a new message has been posted on a bill. You can also subscribe to other pages you want to follow, such as your nation message-board, party organisations or bills outside your nation which you are interested in. |
| Random quote: "Conservative, n: A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal who wishes to replace them with others." - Ambrose Bierce |