We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: House of Lusk Restoration Act (Correction)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Fortunato's Fascist Formation
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2872
Description[?]:
| This bill will see the current King removed and the rightful heir to the throne restored. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The formal title of the Head of State.
Old value:: His Most Royal and Serene Majesty, King George I
Current: His Imperial and Most Excellent Royal Majesty, Alexander III of House Steuart-Carmichael, King and Monarch of Hutori, High Chieftain of the Mashacara People, Prince of Orange-Vilyan, Vanuku, Dolgava, Lourenne, Kazullia & Dorvik, Grand Duke of Geharon & Iztapalata, Duke of Stormkapp, Karzon, Carolleux & Bellemont, Count of Ackerly, Lord Sovereign of the Order of the Golden Lion, Supreme Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, Defender of the Constitution and the Faith, as Represented in Hutori, in Service of the People, the Duly Elected Right Honourable President of the Commonwealth
Proposed: His Most Royal and Serene Highness, King Donald I
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:45:16, January 01, 2010 CET | From | Fortunato's Fascist Formation | To | Debating the House of Lusk Restoration Act (Correction) |
| Message | OOC: I'm never drinking again. I have wasted three proposals. Lol. |
| Date | 00:01:10, January 02, 2010 CET | From | Fortunato's Fascist Formation | To | Debating the House of Lusk Restoration Act (Correction) |
| Message | We wish to express our support for a Lusk monarchy. So we will back a restoration act from the House of Lusk. It's a pity that they could not alter their history. But as for the proposal. I wasn't sure if it was as simple as that legally in the game. Ignore the two proposals and please try not to laugh it was an honest mistake. |
| Date | 00:01:23, January 02, 2010 CET | From | Fortunato's Fascist Formation | To | Debating the House of Lusk Restoration Act (Correction) |
| Message | We wish to express our support for a Lusk monarchy. So we will back a restoration act from the House of Lusk. It's a pity that they could not alter their history. But as for the proposal. I wasn't sure if it was as simple as that legally in the game. Ignore the two proposals and please try not to laugh it was an honest mistake. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 161 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 230 |
| Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law. |
| Random quote: "A cynic is a man who, when he smells flowers, looks around for a coffin." H. L. Mencken |