We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nuclear Free Zone Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Ogden Sinclair Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2134
Description[?]:
| Bill to end production and storage of nuclear weapons |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Proposed: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Current: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Proposed: The nation shall never develop, produce or store nuclear weaponry.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:30:44, October 30, 2005 CET | From | Ogden Sinclair Party | To | Debating the Nuclear Free Zone Bill |
| Message | We the OSP recognise the houses dislike for dual proposal bills but feel that both these go hand in hand. Nuclear weaponry is a dead end |
| Date | 14:22:29, October 30, 2005 CET | From | Jakanian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Nuclear Free Zone Bill |
| Message | We've had this debate twice already. No. |
| Date | 15:33:09, October 30, 2005 CET | From | Jakanian Liberal Socialists | To | Debating the Nuclear Free Zone Bill |
| Message | Article 1 we wholly support due to our currently stable international relations. Article 2 we would also support. The allowing of research we would also support. The JLSP is however worried about the international approach this parliament is currently taking. Pulling out of peaceful treaties for no legitamite reason and pursuing the development of nuclear and biological weapons -will- put us in a more dangerous position, not a safer one. It's those kind of policies that will not only make us targets for terrorists, but also isolate us from larger, freeom-loving and peaceful countries that would otherwise prove to be great allies. So to reiterate, our full support goes to this bill. |
| Date | 16:46:42, October 30, 2005 CET | From | Jakanian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Nuclear Free Zone Bill |
| Message | Hence why we were attacked by terrorists after we signed treaties and stopped having nukes. |
| Date | 18:00:40, October 30, 2005 CET | From | Jakanian Liberal Socialists | To | Debating the Nuclear Free Zone Bill |
| Message | You can get attacked by terrorists for supporting animal research or any one of a hundred reasons. Having nukes isn't going to stop extreme environmentalists from bombing a lab, is it? Have nukes just gives more people more reason to bomb us. |
| Date | 20:51:12, October 30, 2005 CET | From | Ogden Sinclair Party | To | Debating the Nuclear Free Zone Bill |
| Message | If I was Iran i would want nukes, if I was Saddam Husse.in I would wished I'd had nukes, Nukes defend you from hostile nations with nukes, we have no enemies, we must set the example and abandon nuclear weapons |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 86 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 164 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Selucia is Particracy's modern take on Ancient Rome, located on the continent of Majatra. |
| Random quote: "Public schools are government-established, politician- and bureaucrat-controlled, fully politicized, taxpayer-supported, authoritarian socialist institutions. In fact, the public-school system is one of the purest examples of socialism existing in America." - Thomas L. Johnson |