We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Fort William Agreement
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Socialist Party of Sekowo
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2875
Description[?]:
This bill asks for the ratification of the Fort William Agreement. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Fort William Agreement.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:42:01, January 06, 2010 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Ratification of the Fort William Agreement |
Message | OOC: Regardless of if this passes it will be illigitamte. This kind of thing has happened before and it's simpley not going to happen. I have no idea why you want to destroy Sekowo and everything we've built but I will not allow it. |
Date | 19:44:58, January 06, 2010 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party of Sekowo | To | Debating the Ratification of the Fort William Agreement |
Message | OOC: It may be illegitimate in your eyes, but it is legal according to the Pax Cynica as long as it recieves a 2/3rds majority. |
Date | 19:55:44, January 06, 2010 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Ratification of the Fort William Agreement |
Message | OOC: This has happened before and it was prevented. You still ahve't answered why you want to destroy Sekow. |
Date | 20:02:01, January 06, 2010 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party of Sekowo | To | Debating the Ratification of the Fort William Agreement |
Message | OOC: I believe that question should be asked IC |
Date | 20:07:08, January 06, 2010 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Ratification of the Fort William Agreement |
Message | OOC: No, I think you're doing this purposefully for non-IC reasons. |
Date | 20:11:35, January 06, 2010 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party of Sekowo | To | Debating the Ratification of the Fort William Agreement |
Message | OOC: That accusation is baseless. It is not personal, but simply an IC roleplay. |
Date | 19:53:54, January 07, 2010 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Fort William Agreement |
Message | OOC: As stated in Article 6.6.1 of the Game Rules, decisions concerning colonial affairs are legit if passed through a bill requiring 2/3rds. In this case, the decision is connected with a treaty, which requires 2/3rds to pass. If passed, all stated in the document will be issued as legit, and the RP will remain valid. Upon passing, control over the specific colonial affairs shall be handed to Luthori. We suggest that you refrain from heating up the debate as there will be no point in doing so. Signed, Moderation Team |
Date | 21:15:45, January 07, 2010 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Ratification of the Fort William Agreement |
Message | OOC: Well I see this game has completely gon down the toilet, a pity. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 417 | ||
no | Total Seats: 183 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Don't vote yes on a cabinet coalition that doesn't give you the power that you deserve. |
Random quote: "For every action there is an equal and opposite government program." - Bob Wells |