We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: FP4
Details
Submitted by[?]: Mouvement d'Étoile Rouge
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2135
Description[?]:
Foreign Policy reform |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Travel by foreigners to the nation.
Old value:: The nation imposes strict border control on visitors, with intensive security checks, to maintain law and order.
Current: The nation imposes strict border control on visitors, with intensive security checks, to maintain law and order.
Proposed: The nation imposes minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:36:21, October 30, 2005 CET | From | Malfico Progressive Fascist Party | To | Debating the FP4 |
Message | We support this measure. We must allow visitors to our nation so that they can see our great culture. |
Date | 17:17:21, November 01, 2005 CET | From | Mouvement d'Étoile Rouge | To | Debating the FP4 |
Message | Agreed. It is wrong to stop people just visiting. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 494 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 105 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "Conservative, n: A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal who wishes to replace them with others." - Ambrose Bierce |