We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: NATO Co-operation Act 2879
Details
Submitted by[?]: Constitutional Monarchy Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2892
Description[?]:
***Message from the Office of the Vice President*** Minister of Foreign Affairs Sir Bruce Alwin Barbossa, The Northern Area Treaty Organization is putting into effect a new campaign named "Umbrella." The goal of this campaign is to extend NATO's reach all throughout the world. We are officially requesting your government to consider leasing NATO at least one military base in your territory. Financial arrangements can be made at a later time. Please consider our request. Thank you, Kathryne Lincoln III Vice President of the United Republics of Lodamun Chairman of the Council of NATO ---------------------------------------------------- I ask for the co-operation of the government in allocating land for an international military base at a location to be decided at a later date. This is an opportunity for Beluzia to show willingness to work with the international community, and exceed our obligations under the NATO treaty. The base will also provide additional defence for our nation, as it is in the interests of NATO to defend us. Minister of Foreign Affairs Sir Bruce Alwin Barbossa (with the backing of the Minister of State and Laird). |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:14:09, January 16, 2010 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the NATO Co-operation Act 2879 |
Message | All Zogists violently oppose this plan to subjugate Bailon to the schemes of foreign devils! If this bill is passed the inhabitants of this NATO base shall surely be savaged by Bailonese headhunters and sacked by pirates!! |
Date | 14:46:48, January 17, 2010 CET | From | United Egelion Party/Liberal Union | To | Debating the NATO Co-operation Act 2879 |
Message | There are no pirates. |
Date | 02:03:20, January 18, 2010 CET | From | Thai Liberal Democratic Party | To | Debating the NATO Co-operation Act 2879 |
Message | It is foreign invasion and cannot acceptable |
Date | 02:21:24, January 18, 2010 CET | From | Constitutional Monarchy Party | To | Debating the NATO Co-operation Act 2879 |
Message | It is nothing of the sort. It is an international base. It will vastly improve our foreign relations. By not accepting this proposal we are endangering our position in NATO. Beluzia needs allies, and the strategic gains from this far outnumber the relatively small sacrifice of a small amount of territory. |
Date | 13:56:59, January 18, 2010 CET | From | Beluzian National Party | To | Debating the NATO Co-operation Act 2879 |
Message | And in which region will this international base go exactly ? |
Date | 16:32:18, January 18, 2010 CET | From | Constitutional Monarchy Party | To | Debating the NATO Co-operation Act 2879 |
Message | As outlined, Bailon is suitably placed. However, if the location of the base was opposed by the majority in Bailon, another location can be chosen. |
Date | 16:38:21, January 18, 2010 CET | From | Beluzian National Party | To | Debating the NATO Co-operation Act 2879 |
Message | As a party for the interests of Bailon, we do not support it, however, should the people of Bailon agree to it we will happily go along with it also. |
Date | 16:58:41, January 18, 2010 CET | From | Constitutional Monarchy Party | To | Debating the NATO Co-operation Act 2879 |
Message | Perhaps the to find out is simply to see which side recieves more votes in the next election? On that principle, should Bailon seem to favour your side, we shall locate it in a region which gives more support. |
Date | 17:03:06, January 18, 2010 CET | From | Beluzian National Party | To | Debating the NATO Co-operation Act 2879 |
Message | As a party, we are not expecting to win a majority of seats in Bailon, or in any other region for that matter. Our party would only be about 2 years old, and our position on policies would still be unclear somewhat. Your proposal cannot work because the vote is for the parliament, not whether NATO should have a base in Bailon.. |
Date | 17:09:38, January 18, 2010 CET | From | Constitutional Monarchy Party | To | Debating the NATO Co-operation Act 2879 |
Message | Your party is not the only one opposed to this measure, the TPPP has expressed their position opposing it also. If all parties declare their position, we can campaign the election partially on our stance to supporting NATO's proposed base. |
Date | 17:11:47, January 18, 2010 CET | From | Beluzian National Party | To | Debating the NATO Co-operation Act 2879 |
Message | As the proposed location is in Bailon we are opposed to it. If its anywhere else in Beluzia and Bailon, we support it. |
Date | 07:12:54, January 19, 2010 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the NATO Co-operation Act 2879 |
Message | The only Party for the interests of Bailon is the People's Populist Party!!! |
Date | 17:30:25, January 19, 2010 CET | From | Beluzian National Party | To | Debating the NATO Co-operation Act 2879 |
Message | And how do you explain that, exactly ? |
Date | 16:09:28, January 20, 2010 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the NATO Co-operation Act 2879 |
Message | Zog is traditional leader of Bailon and the the Primate of the Bailonese Catholic Church! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 21 | |||
no | Total Seats: 29 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 50 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow official national flags of real-life nations or flags which are very prominent and recognisable (eg. the flags of the European Union, the United Nations, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or the Confederate States of America). |
Random quote: "I'm not interested in preserving the status quo; I want to overthrow it." - Niccolo Machiavelli |