We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Personal Freedoms IV
Details
Submitted by[?]: National People's Gang
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2134
Description[?]:
| Neither local nor central government has any authority to define the terms "affection" or "obscene" - it is therefore ridiculous for politicians to impose their views on communities which are perfectly able to decide between appropriate and inappropriate behaviour. In short, keep your politico noses out of our communities and get on with the job you're supposed to be doing, or else you might just experience the affectionate embrace known on the streets as a "Jorka Kiss". |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: Local governments may regulate laws on public acts of affection and obscenity.
Current: All sexually implicit actions are illegal in public.
Proposed: There are no laws regarding obscene public acts.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:14:36, November 01, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the Personal Freedoms IV |
| Message | Brother Cudgel of Enlightened Serenity awaits this "Jorka kiss" with open arms but a closed crotch. |
| Date | 18:22:27, November 01, 2005 CET | From |  National People's Gang | To | Debating the Personal Freedoms IV |
| Message | Saint Teresa Mulrooney puckers up while fitting the knuckledusters and checking the astronomical charts, as she waits patiently for a moonless night, a dark alley and Brother Cudgel to coincide. |
| Date | 02:55:12, November 02, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the Personal Freedoms IV |
| Message | OK, but he's bringin' along his buddy, Mother Superior Brassknuckles of Blessed Compassion. |
| Date | 21:51:47, November 02, 2005 CET | From | National People's Gang | To | Debating the Personal Freedoms IV |
| Message | Can the Mother Superior dance? Saint Teresa's brothers, The Shinkicker Twins, of the Sacred Bleeding Heart Chapel and Benevolent Society, love to put in a bit o fancy footwork. |
| Date | 00:35:42, November 03, 2005 CET | From | Slaytanic Wehrmacht | To | Debating the Personal Freedoms IV |
| Message | just hope belzebub doesn't stumble over you during your "games". He likes that kind of action. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 176 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 124 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "The word 'politics' is derived from the word 'poly', meaning 'many', and the word 'ticks', meaning 'blood sucking parasites.'" - Larry Hardiman |