We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Energia verde
Details
Submitted by[?]: Partito illuminista - S.I.
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2882
Description[?]:
Come già detto più volte, l'energia nucleare è una tecnologia obsoleta (data XX secolo, quasi 900 anni fa!). Inoltre non dà sicurezze per quanto riguarda lo smaltimento delle scorie. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on nuclear power.
Old value:: The government requires most energy to be generated by nuclear power.
Current: The decision is left up to local governments.
Proposed: Nuclear power plants are not permitted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:52:00, January 20, 2010 CET | From | Avanti Istalia! | To | Debating the Energia verde |
Message | ooc - si presume che la tecnologia rimanga pressoché inalterata, credo |
Date | 17:21:23, January 20, 2010 CET | From | Partito illuminista - S.I. | To | Debating the Energia verde |
Message | [ooc: sì, credo anch'io ma il riferimento all'obsolescenza mi serviva da espediente retorico ;-) Comunque il nucleare è obsoleto anche oggi, nel 2010 ;-)] |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 245 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 354 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
Random quote: "I swear to the Lord I still can't see Why Democracy means Everybody but me." - Langston Hughes, The Black Man Speaks |