We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Debate Integrity Act of 2887
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Front for Change
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2887
Description[?]:
| To limit the CEP's random and overwhelming number of proposals; to focus our debate and attention on key issues. With too many bills on the table, has any party noticed the decline in quality of debate? We all rush to vote on all of them, without fully debating the complexities or noticing the arguments made by other parties. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The maximum proposal quota a party can accumulate.
Old value:: 23
Current: 30
Proposed: 12
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:56:42, February 02, 2010 CET | From |  National Workers Party of Hutori | To | Debating the Debate Integrity Act of 2887 |
| Message | Mr.Speaker i say it should be doubled |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 179 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 99 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 113 |
| Random fact: It is not allowed to call more than 5 elections in 5 game years in a nation. The default sanction for a player persisting in the early election tactic will be a seat reset. |
| Random quote: "You have to remember one thing about the will of the people: it wasn't that long ago that we were swept away by the Macarena." - Jon Stewart |