We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: DSPB.0254.2888 Ratification of the Trade Embargo of Anti-Religion Countries
Details
Submitted by[?]: BDSP un Beys fun Yisserles-Binyomen
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2894
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Trade Embargo of Anti-Religion Countries. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Trade Embargo of Anti-Religion Countries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:16:16, February 02, 2010 CET | From | Bismarckian National Resistance (BNR) | To | Debating the DSPB.0254.2888 Ratification of the Trade Embargo of Anti-Religion Countries |
| Message | I do not support this. It claims some governments think they can force people to be atheist, yet allow countries to make membership in their national religion mandatory. I despise hypocrisy. |
| Date | 08:09:08, February 03, 2010 CET | From | BDSP un Beys fun Yisserles-Binyomen | To | Debating the DSPB.0254.2888 Ratification of the Trade Embargo of Anti-Religion Countries |
| Message | You have quite a point there. Should we draft a new treaty? |
| Date | 16:57:29, February 03, 2010 CET | From | Bismarckian National Resistance (BNR) | To | Debating the DSPB.0254.2888 Ratification of the Trade Embargo of Anti-Religion Countries |
| Message | I am willing. Give me an outline, I will draft it, we look at it, changed what needs to be changed, and put it into ratification. |
| Date | 09:58:42, February 06, 2010 CET | From | BDSP un Beys fun Yisserles-Binyomen | To | Debating the DSPB.0254.2888 Ratification of the Trade Embargo of Anti-Religion Countries |
| Message | Basically, a freedom of religion treaty where ratifiers would refuse to trade with nations that regulate which religions are allowed and those that don't even allow religion. |
| Date | 19:59:04, February 06, 2010 CET | From | Am Echad, Pays Libre | To | Debating the DSPB.0254.2888 Ratification of the Trade Embargo of Anti-Religion Countries |
| Message | I would not support that. Our beleife is that nations that have state religions should not be punished as states without any religion. |
| Date | 17:33:56, February 10, 2010 CET | From | BDSP un Beys fun Yisserles-Binyomen | To | Debating the DSPB.0254.2888 Ratification of the Trade Embargo of Anti-Religion Countries |
| Message | We would not punish state religions, we would punish those who enforce their state religion without exception. |
| Date | 19:21:07, February 13, 2010 CET | From | Bismarckian National Resistance (BNR) | To | Debating the DSPB.0254.2888 Ratification of the Trade Embargo of Anti-Religion Countries |
| Message | In the end, we would be supporting freedom of religion either way, because the treaty would punish those who make religion illegal or who make it mandatory. I will draft that treaty now; sorry for my slowness in doing so. |
| Date | 20:28:11, February 13, 2010 CET | From | Bismarckian National Resistance (BNR) | To | Debating the DSPB.0254.2888 Ratification of the Trade Embargo of Anti-Religion Countries |
| Message | Here it is: http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=1684 |
| Date | 21:04:01, February 13, 2010 CET | From | BDSP un Beys fun Yisserles-Binyomen | To | Debating the DSPB.0254.2888 Ratification of the Trade Embargo of Anti-Religion Countries |
| Message | That's okay. Great. |
| Date | 16:32:40, February 15, 2010 CET | From | Bismarckian National Resistance (BNR) | To | Debating the DSPB.0254.2888 Ratification of the Trade Embargo of Anti-Religion Countries |
| Message | I must vote no on this. Call me self-righteous, but my treaty is much more comprehensive than this one, and does not allow forced religion or forced atheism. |
| Date | 23:13:19, February 15, 2010 CET | From | BDSP un Beys fun Yisserles-Binyomen | To | Debating the DSPB.0254.2888 Ratification of the Trade Embargo of Anti-Religion Countries |
| Message | This treaty does not go against your treaty, it simply supports it. This does not require trade with anyone and therefore only does less of what your treaty does, supplementing it. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 241 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 259 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where players have failed to clearly and accurately reference their nation's RP laws in the "Bills under debate" section, Moderation will rule them invalid if a challenge is made to their validity. |
| Random quote: "If we cannot, by reason, by influence, by example, by strenuous effort, and by personal sacrifice, mend the bad places of civilization, we certainly cannot do it by force." - Auberon Herbert |