Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5470
Next month in: 03:00:21
Server time: 12:59:38, April 16, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): LC73DunMHP | libdem555 | Mbites2 | MnarĀ¢ist unin | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Repeal Ecology Protection

Details

Submitted by[?]: New Age

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2889

Description[?]:

We can't be part of a treaty that limits our ability to effectively and safely use our own national resources.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:42:45, February 03, 2010 CET
FromGreen Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Repeal Ecology Protection
MessageBut we have to be part of a treaty that limits our ability to exploit, abuse and destroy natural resources.

Date15:54:24, February 03, 2010 CET
FromNew Age
ToDebating the Repeal Ecology Protection
MessageThere's a fine line and I think this treaty crosses it. We can be responsible whilst not raping the environment. We shouldn't be in a treaty that has such strict limits on how we can use our own resources.

Date18:35:14, February 03, 2010 CET
FromPeople's Party - Republican Democrats
ToDebating the Repeal Ecology Protection
MessageWe think that this treaty is actually quite lenient in its restrictions, giving several alternatives in most areas while it doesn't allow for excessive exploitation.

Date14:09:18, February 04, 2010 CET
FromGreen Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Repeal Ecology Protection
MessageOh this treaty is not strict enough for the environment.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
  

Total Seats: 249

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed).

    Random quote: "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." - Ed Howdershelt

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 50