We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Freedom to Preach
Details
Submitted by[?]: AM Radical Libertarian Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2135
Description[?]:
| WHEREAS It is not the place of the government to interfere with the practice of religion in our land, AND In order for any institution to grow, it must be allowed to place it's message before the people, THEREFORE it is incumbent upon our Senate to revoke the unjustified and paternalistic ban on religious advertisement and promotion. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards evangelism and religious advertising.
Old value:: Religions are not permitted to promote themselves or advertise in any manner whatsoever.
Current: Religions are required to obtain government approval before promoting themselves or advertising in any manner.
Proposed: Religions are permitted to freely promote and advertise themselves.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:23:55, October 31, 2005 CET | From | AM Radical Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Freedom to Preach |
| Message | Jean V. DuBois Lt.-Col., M.I., our honored minsiter of Education, places this bill into consideration: "It is rediculous to allow makers of toilet bowl brushes to go befor the people promoting the merits of thier product, yet not allowing our churches the same freedom. There is no way anyone can make a truely informed choice without the facts, yet our outmoded laws do not allow the facts to be put before the people. This must change!" |
| Date | 00:34:46, November 01, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Party | To | Debating the Freedom to Preach |
| Message | We'll support this proposal. |
| Date | 01:35:06, November 01, 2005 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Freedom to Preach |
| Message | The Sacred Order Faction of the Anarch Anakrousite Shatter offers support for this bill. |
| Date | 13:54:02, November 01, 2005 CET | From | Front for State Prosperity | To | Debating the Freedom to Preach |
| Message | Eh, why not. We'll vote against it to gain capital in front of secularists. We're probably going to be the divergent vote, all the better. |
| Date | 17:19:23, November 01, 2005 CET | From | AM Radical Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Freedom to Preach |
| Message | Now that the elections are over, moving to vote. |
| Date | 09:35:37, November 02, 2005 CET | From | Representative Party | To | Debating the Freedom to Preach |
| Message | We support this bill |
| Date | 14:42:14, November 02, 2005 CET | From | Front for State Prosperity | To | Debating the Freedom to Preach |
| Message | Nice being the dissenter. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 468 | |||||||
| no | Total Seats: 32 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker). |
| Random quote: "With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day." - Martin Luther King Jr. |