We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Elimination of Proposal Cap, Article I: Revision
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Imperial Hobrazian Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2134
Description[?]:
| With the influx of active parties in our great nation, it's almost becoming a headache to wade through the legislation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The number of proposals a party can introduce per year (will be handed out as a monthly quota).
Old value:: 20
Current: 1
Proposed: 7
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:03:16, October 31, 2005 CET | From |  National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the Elimination of Proposal Cap, Article I: Revision |
| Message | I can always alter the value to whatever suits everyone best. |
| Date | 22:09:27, October 31, 2005 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the Elimination of Proposal Cap, Article I: Revision |
| Message | You'll have to reduce it further to actually cut down on the number of bills being introduced. We support in general though. |
| Date | 22:16:28, October 31, 2005 CET | From | Deltarian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Elimination of Proposal Cap, Article I: Revision |
| Message | I've got no complaints. |
| Date | 23:03:50, October 31, 2005 CET | From | Capitalizt Party | To | Debating the Elimination of Proposal Cap, Article I: Revision |
| Message | Less, less. 5 proposals. |
| Date | 00:24:13, November 01, 2005 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the Elimination of Proposal Cap, Article I: Revision |
| Message | Five is awfully low... how's seven sound? |
| Date | 01:03:55, November 01, 2005 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the Elimination of Proposal Cap, Article I: Revision |
| Message | We can agree with this. |
| Date | 14:12:15, November 01, 2005 CET | From | Capitalizt Party | To | Debating the Elimination of Proposal Cap, Article I: Revision |
| Message | Same here. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 400 | |||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players are expected to play the game independently and should not share their passwords or allow others to access their accounts. |
| Random quote: Although I understand and respect the intentions behind the gesture, this is not something that is universally understood or appreciated, and it tends to give out a negative impression of our party. ~ Anton Weinreich, General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party, pleading with his members to stop burning the national flag |