We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Commonwealth Nations of Terra Alliance
Details
Submitted by[?]: Bismarckian National Resistance (BNR)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2893
Description[?]:
This bill asks for the ratification of the Commonwealth Nations of Terra Alliance. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Commonwealth Nations of Terra Alliance.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:30:57, February 12, 2010 CET | From | Am Echad, Pays Libre | To | Debating the Ratification of the Commonwealth Nations of Terra Alliance |
Message | We would like to let the people of the Knesset know that our party is not against joining the Commonwealth. We are just against a Constitutional Monarchy ruled by a foreign king. |
Date | 17:34:58, February 12, 2010 CET | From | BDSP un Beys fun Yisserles-Binyomen | To | Debating the Ratification of the Commonwealth Nations of Terra Alliance |
Message | We would like the same noted of us. |
Date | 22:43:49, February 12, 2010 CET | From | Bismarckian National Resistance (BNR) | To | Debating the Ratification of the Commonwealth Nations of Terra Alliance |
Message | I understand. However, and I myself forgot this, joining the Commonwealth is a requirement of the Treaty of Poesy. |
Date | 23:34:57, February 12, 2010 CET | From | Parti Imperial du Peuple (IA) | To | Debating the Ratification of the Commonwealth Nations of Terra Alliance |
Message | OOC: Actually, the current monarch is half Yishelem. His mother was the daughter of the Prince of New Yishelem, which was a noble state in the former Kingdom. So technically he is not foreign, well at least for you. |
Date | 23:59:49, February 12, 2010 CET | From | BDSP un Beys fun Yisserles-Binyomen | To | Debating the Ratification of the Commonwealth Nations of Terra Alliance |
Message | OOC: He's not that native either. |
Date | 00:20:35, February 13, 2010 CET | From | Am Echad, Pays Libre | To | Debating the Ratification of the Commonwealth Nations of Terra Alliance |
Message | OOC and IC: Well, he is still foreign to us. |
Date | 13:21:30, February 13, 2010 CET | From | HaLeumit Tikvah | To | Debating the Ratification of the Commonwealth Nations of Terra Alliance |
Message | OOC: I thought the nobility of New Yishalem was the same as Luthori? |
Date | 20:59:47, February 13, 2010 CET | From | BDSP un Beys fun Yisserles-Binyomen | To | Debating the Ratification of the Commonwealth Nations of Terra Alliance |
Message | OOC: I think that is not the weak argument the Luthors were making. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 500 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "The first step in freeing yourself from social restrictions is the realization that there is no such thing as a 'safe' code of conduct, one that would earn everyone's approval. Your actions can always be condemned by someone, for being too bold or too apathetic, for being too conformist or too nonconformist, for being too liberal or too conservative. So it's necessary to decide whose approval is important to you." - Harry Browne |