We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: DSPB.0273.2893 Civil Liberties
Details
Submitted by[?]: BDSP un Beys fun Yisserles-Binyomen
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2894
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning who can proceed with adoption; in case adoption is legal.
Old value:: Only couples may adopt children.
Current: Everyone may adopt children.
Proposed: Everyone may adopt children.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign marriages.
Old value:: Only foreign marriages that comply with domestic policy regarding marriage are recognised.
Current: All foreign marriages are recognised, regardless of domestic policy regarding marriage.
Proposed: All foreign marriages are recognised, regardless of domestic policy regarding marriage.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The confidentiality of letters and correspondence.
Old value:: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate it in extreme situations.
Current: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate the confidentiality of letters with grounded cause.
Proposed: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate the confidentiality of letters with grounded cause.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to polygamy.
Old value:: The government does not recognise polygamous relationships.
Current: Local governments establish policies on polygamy.
Proposed: Polygamous marriages are accorded equal recognition to monogamous marriages.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on population control.
Old value:: Population control is left to local governments.
Current: The government actively promotes population growth.
Proposed: The government actively promotes population growth.
Article 6
Proposal[?] to change Weapons allowed to private citizens.
Old value:: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Current: Citizens may own any type of weapon. They may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Proposed: Citizens may own any type of weapon. They may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:37:29, February 12, 2010 CET | From | Bismarckian National Resistance (BNR) | To | Debating the DSPB.0273.2893 Civil Liberties |
| Message | I believe 6 and 7 are fine as they are now. |
| Date | 00:17:42, February 13, 2010 CET | From | Am Echad, Pays Libre | To | Debating the DSPB.0273.2893 Civil Liberties |
| Message | I vote no on this attack on family values. |
| Date | 00:25:19, February 13, 2010 CET | From | BDSP un Beys fun Yisserles-Binyomen | To | Debating the DSPB.0273.2893 Civil Liberties |
| Message | I expected such from you. |
| Date | 13:18:39, February 13, 2010 CET | From | HaLeumit Tikvah | To | Debating the DSPB.0273.2893 Civil Liberties |
| Message | We wont' support 5, 6 or 7. |
| Date | 21:03:21, February 13, 2010 CET | From | BDSP un Beys fun Yisserles-Binyomen | To | Debating the DSPB.0273.2893 Civil Liberties |
| Message | Would you accept a middle ground on 5 or what's now 6 which was 7? |
| Date | 21:29:04, February 13, 2010 CET | From | Am Echad, Pays Libre | To | Debating the DSPB.0273.2893 Civil Liberties |
| Message | We support 5 and 6 |
| Date | 22:09:47, February 13, 2010 CET | From | BDSP un Beys fun Yisserles-Binyomen | To | Debating the DSPB.0273.2893 Civil Liberties |
| Message | Great. I may split them from this bill. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 156 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 344 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "The Holy Roman Empire was neither Holy, nor Roman, nor an Empire" - Voltaire |