We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Liberty I
Details
Submitted by[?]: International Society of Bankers
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2136
Description[?]:
Liberty |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Food and beverage labeling regulations.
Old value:: Companies must clearly label food and beverage products, in a manner that can be easily understood.
Current: Companies must clearly label food and beverage products, in a manner that can be easily understood.
Proposed: There are no laws concerning food and beverage labeling.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 02:12:20, November 02, 2005 CET | From | Lodamun Centre-Left Coalition | To | Debating the Liberty I |
Message | Opposed. |
Date | 03:25:20, November 02, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the Liberty I |
Message | Can a company sell poison and label it "Yummy Treats"? |
Date | 18:19:37, November 02, 2005 CET | From | Slaytanic Wehrmacht | To | Debating the Liberty I |
Message | We, the Satanists, demand the right to sell poison and label it "Yummy Treats". |
Date | 22:22:06, November 02, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the Liberty I |
Message | Of course you do. The high popualtion of Satanists in Lodamun is why these questions need to be asked. Can a Satanist bottle napalm and call it holy water? Can they add "endorsed by the Pope"? |
Date | 22:25:28, November 02, 2005 CET | From | Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Liberty I |
Message | The Deltarian pope, perhaps. |
Date | 00:24:40, November 03, 2005 CET | From | Slaytanic Wehrmacht | To | Debating the Liberty I |
Message | What's wrong with calling napalm "holy water"? We always use it for the ceremonies during our short visits at Lord Satan down in Hell. |
Date | 00:25:36, November 03, 2005 CET | From | Slaytanic Wehrmacht | To | Debating the Liberty I |
Message | Indeed, if i think about it, forbidding us to call napalm our "holy water" might even violate religious freedom. |
Date | 00:43:54, November 04, 2005 CET | From | Slaytanic Wehrmacht | To | Debating the Liberty I |
Message | Well, after further thinking about it, we had to vote against it. We don't want to risk buying holy water endorsed by the pope labelled "napalm". |
Date | 03:10:23, November 05, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the Liberty I |
Message | If you want to reverse this ridiculous decision, you'll have our support. |
Date | 07:26:03, November 05, 2005 CET | From | Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Liberty I |
Message | What's wrong with consecrated napalm? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 144 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 124 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 32 |
Random fact: Treaties will be eligible for deletion if they are more than 50 in-game years old and have no currently ratified members. |
Random quote: "The superior man, when resting in safety, does not forget that danger may come. When in a state of security he does not forget the possibility of ruin. When all is orderly, he does not forget that disorder may come. Thus his person is not endangered, and his States and all their clans are preserved." - Confucius |