We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Argricultural Reforms
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hutorian Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2896
Description[?]:
.. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government agricultural and farming subsidies policy.
Old value:: Agricultural crops which are considered beneficial to the enviroment or to the continued ecological safety of the state are subsidized.
Current: The government allows local governments to craft agricultural subsidy policy.
Proposed: The government allows local governments to craft agricultural subsidy policy.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning farm size.
Old value:: Farm size is not regulated.
Current: Farm size regulations are determined by local governments.
Proposed: Farm size regulations are determined by local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:53:50, February 16, 2010 CET | From | Union of Radical Republicans (UM) | To | Debating the Argricultural Reforms |
Message | Madame Speaker, we support the second article, but request the petitioners explain the reasoning behind the former one. |
Date | 13:57:38, February 17, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Argricultural Reforms |
Message | Madam Speaker, we of the HNP believe that if the URR dissaprove of the first article and accept the second then they are unsure of their own policy.This is because both articles go hand in hand with each other. As regards to their question, if Farm sizes should be regulated by local governments shouldn't the local governments be entitled to create their own agricultural policy? |
Date | 15:55:25, February 17, 2010 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Argricultural Reforms |
Message | Madam Speaker, the logic of the HNP is clear, and we are surprised at the reluctance of the URR to support it. Madam Speaker, we cannot support this because we do not believe that farm size should be regulated at all, and would like to see it come about that there be no farming subsidies neither. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 263 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 128 |
Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility. |
Random quote: "If the misery of the poor be caused not by the laws of nature, but by our institutions, great is our sin." - Charles Darwin |