We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Trick or Treaty withdrawl
Details
Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Alcoholic Party II
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2136
Description[?]:
| Ok, this is basically just "Hunting Time" http://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=26527 , but this time I'm more hopeful that we can get it through. |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the Treaty for the Protection of Endangered Animals.
Article 2
Withdraw from the Treaty on the Keeping of Endangered Animals.
Article 3
Withdraw from the International Ecotourism Treaty.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:52:27, November 01, 2005 CET | From |  RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Trick or Treaty withdrawl |
| Message | Never! We shall not allow our environment to be compromised! |
| Date | 22:48:14, November 01, 2005 CET | From | Civic Democratic Party | To | Debating the Trick or Treaty withdrawl |
| Message | Fully, 100%, support. |
| Date | 00:05:56, November 02, 2005 CET | From | Radical Freedom Party | To | Debating the Trick or Treaty withdrawl |
| Message | Opposed. |
| Date | 08:20:57, November 02, 2005 CET | From | Veritaserum | To | Debating the Trick or Treaty withdrawl |
| Message | Opposed as well. |
| Date | 11:07:49, November 05, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Trick or Treaty withdrawl |
| Message | We dont believe parliament should be restricted |
| Date | 12:40:09, November 05, 2005 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Trick or Treaty withdrawl |
| Message | Bullshit, you just don't believe the environment should be protected. |
| Date | 12:46:38, November 05, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Alcoholic Party II | To | Debating the Trick or Treaty withdrawl |
| Message | RFP - You supported our other animal bill, can we expect your support on this one too? |
| Date | 12:55:18, November 05, 2005 CET | From | Radical Freedom Party | To | Debating the Trick or Treaty withdrawl |
| Message | No. We support membership of these treaties. |
| Date | 13:30:31, November 05, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Imperialist Party | To | Debating the Trick or Treaty withdrawl |
| Message | Aye. Although we would probably support a lot of the issues proposed by these treaties in Parliament, we believe that the Rutanian people deserve more than a sleezy group of parties using a short term majority to almost permanently lock in their views. |
| Date | 14:00:19, November 05, 2005 CET | From | Radical Freedom Party | To | Debating the Trick or Treaty withdrawl |
| Message | So two-thirds of the parliament consisted of 'sleezy' parties at the time of this decision? |
| Date | 17:29:30, November 05, 2005 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Trick or Treaty withdrawl |
| Message | Are you still using that "permanently locking in" argument? Have you ever heard of the possibility of withdrawing from a treaty? |
| Date | 11:53:38, November 06, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Imperialist Party | To | Debating the Trick or Treaty withdrawl |
| Message | It's difficult to withdraw from treaties, and ultimately pointless to pass them if they're easy to be withdrawn from. If you want to improve human rights or whathaveyou, propose bills in Parliament rather than treaties. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 217 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 327 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 55 |
| Random fact: Before creating a party organisation, check to see whether there are any existing organisations which cover the same agenda. |
| Random quote: "Politics have no relation to morals." - Niccolo Machiavelli |