Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5461
Next month in: 01:00:53
Server time: 10:59:06, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of August 2895

Details

Submitted by[?]: Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2896

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:32:39, February 18, 2010 CET
FromVerfassungs Unabhängigkeit Partei
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2895
MessageThe VUP find it odd that the KHP has gotten two major ministrys while the VUP got none (considering that the KHP is only 29 seats more then the VUP.

Date18:45:10, February 18, 2010 CET
FromKonstitutionelle Monarchie Partei
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2895
MessageI wouldn't call Science & Technology not a major Ministry. Perhaps it does not always get the funding it should but nonetheless has a lot of responsibilities under it's belt. Why is the VUP discouraged now with what they got ONLY AFTER the cabinet has been put up to vote?

Date21:50:54, February 18, 2010 CET
FromLiberaldemokratische Allianz
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2895
MessageIndeed, the allocation of portfolios is out of balance. The VUP has held defense for quite a while, and with the CZP's recent performance I believe they should receive Finance

Date01:03:02, February 19, 2010 CET
FromKonstitutionelle Monarchie Partei
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2895
MessageWell, nice of you to say this as well, again only after the cabinet has been put to vote.

Date01:09:43, February 19, 2010 CET
FromLiberaldemokratische Allianz
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2895
MessageThe cabinet was up for debate for a maximum of 3 months (at most 12 hours) before it was put to a vote. While I was attending to other matters (i.e. messages), I had not done more than a cursory glance at the cabinet proposal. The fact that the VUP also responded after the cabinet was put to a vote shows, I think, that for such a re-distributive proposal not enough time was given for debate - another day would have been enough time.

Date11:01:12, February 19, 2010 CET
FromVerfassungs Unabhängigkeit Partei
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2895
Messagein fact I was busy for personnal matters as well and thus I couldn't responed to the cabinet proposel.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 342

no
 

Total Seats: 173

abstain
   

Total Seats: 210


Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost.

Random quote: "A claim for equality of material position can be met only by a government with totalitarian powers." - Friedrich Hayek

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 67