Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 02:09:11
Server time: 13:50:48, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Tayes3 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Animal Protection Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: People's Union for Upturn and Openness

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2899

Description[?]:

The PUUO wishes to change the following bills in order to protect the rights of animals better:

- The use of animals in the cosmetics industry.
Cosmetics are a luxury product, not a life-saving product. Therefore, the PUUO finds it incredible that the use of lab animals is still allowed in the cosmetics industry in Rutania, while there are numerous alternatives available. For those who don't know it, the animals are used to test whether a product irritates the eyes (Warning, image may be shocking - http://www.teleac.nl/mmbase/images/2013334), the skin (Warning, image may be shocking -http://www.gaia.be/ned/contentimage/illustraties/dierproeven3.jpg), or lots of other very interesting uses. Nevertheless, alternatives that aren't animal-unfriendly are available and used.
If Rutania wants to be known as a civilized country, we can no longer tolerate this kind of cruelty.

We want to stress that at this moment the PUUO is not against the use of animals in the pharmaceutical industry, since no economically viable alternatives are available there, and the development of drugs is a matter of life or death to our population.

- Wild animals
An interesting word in the term "wild animal" is "wild". The dictionary describes this word as "living in a state of nature; not tamed or domesticated". By definition wild animals aren't pets, and shouldn't be kept as pets for 2 reasons: the well-being of the animal which is far better of in its natural environment or in a zoo where professionals can give them an environment they deserve; and the safety of the Rutanian population.
Since my neighbour bought himself a black panter, I can no longer let my children play outside alone, or let the dog have a walk through the garden. Furthermore, the current legislation has opened the door for abuse by pet shops who only care about their profits. Last week my 76-year old grandmother went to the pet shop to buy herself a small dog to keep her company, but the shop owner sold her a very expensive dingo!

The PUUO demands that the unneeded abuse of animals stops, and asks other parties to support this bill.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:01:01, February 23, 2010 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Animal Protection Bill
MessageFreedom agrees with the legislation offered by the PUUO and will support this bill when it comes to a vote.

Ben Richards
Leader of the Opposition
Freedom Party Ldr

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 298

no
    

Total Seats: 202

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Cultural Protocols should generally be reflective of RP conducted within the nation and should not significantly alter or modify the ethnic, religious or linguistic composition without considerable and reasonable role-play or other justification.

    Random quote: "Ninety percent of the politicians give the other ten percent a bad reputation." - Henry Kissinger

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 47