Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 00:36:22
Server time: 19:23:37, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (7): ADM Drax | Drax | jamescfm-kaf | Moderation | Ost | R Drax | reformist2024 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: PPUN/PPNU. Relaxation of Economic Protectionism Act - 2898

Details

Submitted by[?]: Partido Popular de Unidad Nacional

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2899

Description[?]:

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:51:07, February 23, 2010 CET
From Partido Popular de Unidad Nacional
ToDebating the PPUN/PPNU. Relaxation of Economic Protectionism Act - 2898
MessageThe Government should not intervene too much in the economy, although national companies must remain national, meaning that no foreign investor may get a majority share.

Date18:46:11, February 23, 2010 CET
FromFree Movement of Gaduridos
ToDebating the PPUN/PPNU. Relaxation of Economic Protectionism Act - 2898
MessageWe will support this act

Date19:12:32, February 23, 2010 CET
FromImperial East Terra Company
ToDebating the PPUN/PPNU. Relaxation of Economic Protectionism Act - 2898
MessageThe Imperial East Terra Company is Gaduridos. Gaduridos is The Imperial East Terra Company. They are synonymous terms and thus cannot be open to foreign investment.

Date00:16:16, February 24, 2010 CET
FromRoyalist Party
ToDebating the PPUN/PPNU. Relaxation of Economic Protectionism Act - 2898
MessageThe current bill and the recommended changes both have good points, if we allow foreigners to invest too much into our markets, we will be at their mercy, or domestic investors may be pushed into foreign investment themselves. If we discourage foreign investment by making it look like it could be difficult to even get their foot in the door, we risk depriving ourselves. How about a compromise? Allow foreign investment, but instead of a loose term which the proposal looks like 0-50%. We could give a lower finite number allowing foreign investment, but without threatening ourselves.

Date01:11:47, February 24, 2010 CET
FromFree Movement of Gaduridos
ToDebating the PPUN/PPNU. Relaxation of Economic Protectionism Act - 2898
MessageRoyalist, of the options, this is the closet we can get to that

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 39

no
 

Total Seats: 26

abstain
  

Total Seats: 10


Random fact: For more information on Particracy's former colonial nations, check out http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6640

Random quote: "To refuse political equality is to rob the ostracized of all self-respect." - Elizabeth Cady Stanton

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61