We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: PPUN/PPNU. Relaxation of Economic Protectionism Act - 2898
Details
Submitted by[?]: Partido Popular de Unidad Nacional
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2899
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign investments.
Old value:: Foreign investors need to obtain government approval for all investments in national companies.
Current: Foreign investors are not allowed to invest in national companies.
Proposed: Foreign investors may invest in national companies, but may not get a majority share.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:51:07, February 23, 2010 CET | From | Partido Popular de Unidad Nacional | To | Debating the PPUN/PPNU. Relaxation of Economic Protectionism Act - 2898 |
Message | The Government should not intervene too much in the economy, although national companies must remain national, meaning that no foreign investor may get a majority share. |
Date | 18:46:11, February 23, 2010 CET | From | Free Movement of Gaduridos | To | Debating the PPUN/PPNU. Relaxation of Economic Protectionism Act - 2898 |
Message | We will support this act |
Date | 19:12:32, February 23, 2010 CET | From | Imperial East Terra Company | To | Debating the PPUN/PPNU. Relaxation of Economic Protectionism Act - 2898 |
Message | The Imperial East Terra Company is Gaduridos. Gaduridos is The Imperial East Terra Company. They are synonymous terms and thus cannot be open to foreign investment. |
Date | 00:16:16, February 24, 2010 CET | From | Royalist Party | To | Debating the PPUN/PPNU. Relaxation of Economic Protectionism Act - 2898 |
Message | The current bill and the recommended changes both have good points, if we allow foreigners to invest too much into our markets, we will be at their mercy, or domestic investors may be pushed into foreign investment themselves. If we discourage foreign investment by making it look like it could be difficult to even get their foot in the door, we risk depriving ourselves. How about a compromise? Allow foreign investment, but instead of a loose term which the proposal looks like 0-50%. We could give a lower finite number allowing foreign investment, but without threatening ourselves. |
Date | 01:11:47, February 24, 2010 CET | From | Free Movement of Gaduridos | To | Debating the PPUN/PPNU. Relaxation of Economic Protectionism Act - 2898 |
Message | Royalist, of the options, this is the closet we can get to that |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 39 | ||
no | Total Seats: 26 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 10 |
Random fact: For more information on Particracy's former colonial nations, check out http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6640 |
Random quote: "To refuse political equality is to rob the ostracized of all self-respect." - Elizabeth Cady Stanton |