Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 03:04:05
Server time: 12:55:54, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Government Devolution Programme 2134

Details

Submitted by[?]: Anti-Particracy and Unionist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2135

Description[?]:

The essence of democracy is the closeness of the everyday people to the governmental process. We must give more power to local governments.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:59:53, November 02, 2005 CET
FromAnti-Particracy and Unionist Party
ToDebating the Government Devolution Programme 2134
MessageI understand that Article 3 in particular may cause some problems, however, I deign to assume that at least most of us are against the striking of cheeky children. Think to your friends, family and other acquaintances. Some will not hit at all, some will smack the bottom when a young child is particularly naughty, but most will not stoop to outright violence. We should give the democratic local governments the right to decide what we already know, for themselves. The morality of physical discipline is not a problem, in my opinion, but the morality of not letting the people decide that, is.

Date11:02:55, November 02, 2005 CET
FromAnti-Particracy and Unionist Party
ToDebating the Government Devolution Programme 2134
MessageAlso, Article 1: Those sites in the vast majority of cases, are of local interest, such as castles, old parks, historic monuments to heroes of the past... The people will keep them democratically, because they are of interest to that particular population. If they have no interest in it, why should they be required to spend their tax on it?

Date14:19:55, November 02, 2005 CET
FromProgressive Party
ToDebating the Government Devolution Programme 2134
MessageI am voting nay due to article 3.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 284

no
  

Total Seats: 73

abstain
 

Total Seats: 44


Random fact: It is possible for a player to transfer ownership of a character or a royal house to another player. This should be done in a public way, such as on the Character Transfers thread, so that if a dispute arises in the future, Moderation can be pointed towards evidence of the transfer.

Random quote: "America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." - Abraham Lincoln

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59