We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Treaty of Kien
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rutanian Elitist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2904
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Treaty of Kien. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Treaty of Kien.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:53:57, March 03, 2010 CET | From | Rutanian Elitist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Kien |
| Message | Honourable Members of Parliament, I am sure you saw the stance that was took by the Hulstrian government towards us. In one way, and partially their anger is rightful. So in order to save our good relations and not to enter into a complicated conflict that would harm the Commonwealth, I ask you all, to vote for this treaty as soon as possible. After this treaty passes, the relationship with Hulstria will be put to and even stronger and more friendly basis. Ronald Puwak, Prime Minister |
| Date | 21:59:24, March 03, 2010 CET | From | Latter-Day Saints Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Kien |
| Message | We will not, under any circumstances, support this treaty. We are more than open to negotiations with the Hulstrians, which were progressing well until their recent announcement, but we will not accept this unfair agreement. Henry Cosgrave, M.P. Minister of Foreign Affairs Commonwealth of Rutania |
| Date | 17:41:40, March 06, 2010 CET | From | People's Union for Upturn and Openness | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Kien |
| Message | The PUUO is surprised to see what "under any circumstances" means for the LDSP. Suddenly "this unfair agreement" isn't unfair any more? |
| Date | 17:52:00, March 06, 2010 CET | From | Rutanian Elitist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Kien |
| Message | Can we ask the PUUO to explain why they are opposing the treaty? |
| Date | 10:51:51, March 07, 2010 CET | From | People's Union for Upturn and Openness | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Kien |
| Message | The PUUO feels it's impossible to ratify this treaty after the billions that have been spent by Rutania on this project. Furthermore, the PUUO doesn't feel the need to solve the problems of the REP and the LDSP again, since it is clearly that it's only a support in one direction. Our no-vote is final, maybe this time the REP can try to convince Freedom of the importance of ratifying this treaty. |
| Date | 16:41:57, March 07, 2010 CET | From | Latter-Day Saints Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Kien |
| Message | OOC: Although I have previously given my support as a way to put an end to a really bad situation, I must admit that I overlooked a major flaw in this treaty that puts an end to my support. I must direct your attention to Article II, Section 3 of this treaty. As it clearly demonstrates, the Hulstrians are trying to deliberately deny us the right to join in the administration of the canal that we built. If this had been different, we would have supported it. But now we cannot. I must ask that all other parties oppose this horrible measure in protest. |
| Date | 18:44:13, March 07, 2010 CET | From | Rutanian Elitist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Kien |
| Message | OOC: Would everybody support the treaty, if we got a permanent seat in the council? |
| Date | 18:47:52, March 07, 2010 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Kien |
| Message | IC: No. Jim Hayworth Leader of the Opposition Freedom Party Ldr |
| Date | 18:58:41, March 07, 2010 CET | From | Latter-Day Saints Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Kien |
| Message | OOC: I would support it if we were added to the list of nations under Article II, section 3. If that happens and if no other adjustments are made, we will support it. All we ask for is that one adjustment. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 145 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 355 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: It is forbidden to impersonate a player or Moderator. |
| Random quote: "Wherever you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship." - Harry S. Truman |