We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Industrial Privatisation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Conservative Conference
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2136
Description[?]:
| All military be privatly owned and run with no regulation from the senate |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Current: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Proposed: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:54:52, November 02, 2005 CET | From | Maroon Party | To | Debating the Military Industrial Privatisation Act |
| Message | We agree; subsidising defense industry makes our society unnecessarily militaristic. |
| Date | 22:57:55, November 03, 2005 CET | From |  Dorvik Social Democrats | To | Debating the Military Industrial Privatisation Act |
| Message | Definately |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 113 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 26 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 61 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "We pursue no other aim than freedom from oppression, liberty from lies, salvation from irrationality!" - Julius Callus, former Davostani politician |