Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5471
Next month in: 00:35:01
Server time: 11:24:58, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military Freedom Act: March 2135

Details

Submitted by[?]: International Society of Bankers

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2138

Description[?]:

To defend the five nations, we must be able to use whatever our armed forces feel is necessary.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:25:50, November 03, 2005 CET
FromSlaytanic Wehrmacht
ToDebating the Military Freedom Act: March 2135
MessageOpposed. The Satanists are peaceful people.

Date02:03:05, November 04, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Military Freedom Act: March 2135
MessageSupported. We aren't

Date22:47:32, November 07, 2005 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the Military Freedom Act: March 2135
MessageSo taxation and regulations are shows of state power, but building massive weapons that could wipe out the human race isnt?

Date00:07:39, November 08, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Military Freedom Act: March 2135
MessageOh dear. This will cause all sorts of problems.

Do tie votes pass?

Date00:22:29, November 08, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Military Freedom Act: March 2135
MessageAs a by-the-way: how is it libertarian to allow the armed forces to do anything they want? Don't they requrie civilian control? Or do the Libertarians support Big Government in the armed forces as they do in Justice?

Date02:08:21, November 08, 2005 CET
FromLodamun Centre-Left Coalition
ToDebating the Military Freedom Act: March 2135
MessageGA, tie votes fail.

Date02:31:23, November 08, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Military Freedom Act: March 2135
MessageHope this is an online day for the DSP....

Date02:37:06, November 08, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Military Freedom Act: March 2135
MessageDue to my committment on the other bill, if DSP fails to vote within a reasonable time, I will withdraw my yes vote.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 150

no
      

Total Seats: 150

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar).

    Random quote: "Seventy-seven percent of anti-abortion leaders are men. 100% of them will never be pregnant." - Planned Parenthood advertisement

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 79