We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Act of Amendment against the Mayoralty Act of 2894, given 2905
Details
Submitted by[?]: House Lusk-Nat'l Syndicalist Party (UM)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2906
Description[?]:
| This act amends the Mayoralty Act of 2894 (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=280621). Article II shall henceforth read in its entirety "II. Each Council must select a method of election from the schedule." No further plurality charters may be granted. Existing ones will be permitted to expire. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:41:12, March 10, 2010 CET | From |  Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Act of Amendment against the Mayoralty Act of 2894, given 2905 |
| Message | Madam Speaker, on the one hand the NLP wish to grant more powers to local authorities, and on the other they wish to interfere in this way. Madam Speaker, I just cannot understand the bias that the NLP has against the FPTP system. Surely if we accept the principle of councils determining most of their affairs, we should accept this system also. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 266 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 83 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 42 |
| Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism"). |
| Random quote: "Politics is not a bad profession. If you succeed there are many rewards, if you disgrace yourself, you can always write a book." - Ronald Reagan |