Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5474
Next month in: 00:31:06
Server time: 03:28:53, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Siffrin | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military Strength of Cildanian Republic

Details

Submitted by[?]: International Extreme Fascist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2914

Description[?]:

The military strength of our nation is recognized as a low and insufficient thus we International Extreme Fascist Party introduce this bill to increase the military spending and to increase military strength of our nation.
This bill will be put in debate for 24 hours.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date06:47:44, March 25, 2010 CET
From Cildanian National Liberty Party
ToDebating the Military Strength of Cildanian Republic
MessageWe strongly disagree with articles 4,6,7 and 8. However since we have 0 seats I guess our vote doesn't really count much : D.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 77

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
       

    Total Seats: 673


    Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

    Random quote: "The main problem of the left is that it has been traditionally divided and unable to reach agreements between different leftist views, whilst the right has almost always moved in the same direction by giving concessions to different rightist points of view." - Aelius Celer, former Selucian politician

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 77