Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 00:00:40
Server time: 15:59:19, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Tayes_Gad | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Anarch Anakrousite Shatter Reform Bill - Removal of Unjust Restraint (iii)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Commonwealth Workers Army

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2136

Description[?]:

The Anarch Anakrousite Shatter believes that the Likatonian Senate has been hasty. We have allowed ourselves to be deprived of sovereign Rights to self-govern - and bound ourselves to policies imposed by deskpilots in foreign powers.

The Anarch Anakrousite Shatter believes we should continue divesting ourselves of some of the excessively controlling Treaties that we have impetuously chained ourselves to.

"After all, if the Likatonian people WANT a curfew, it SHOULD be their right to demand one. If they DON'T want a curfew, the responsibility should STILL lie at the feet of the people, and our democratic system".

"We believe that we MUST remove ALL constricting Treaties - because the people MUST have the right to express their opinions, and MUST have the right to democratically decide their nation's sovereign future... If our people do NOT have the right to free speech when the material is unpalatable, then we can NOT claim that we TRULY have 'free' speech, at all".

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:25:17, November 04, 2005 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Anarch Anakrousite Shatter Reform Bill - Removal of Unjust Restraint (iii)
MessageNote: The suggestion that we 'opt-out' of this treaty, does NOT mean that this party wishes to institute slavery.

ALL it means, is that we believe a NATION must make it's OWN decisions.... whether by internal processes, or because of political/economic pressure from outside.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 200

no
 

Total Seats: 32

abstain
     

Total Seats: 268


Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy.

Random quote: "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." - Ed Howdershelt

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 37