We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Treaty on the Keeping of Endangered Animals
Details
Submitted by[?]: People's Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2138
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Treaty on the Keeping of Endangered Animals. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Treaty on the Keeping of Endangered Animals.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:43:00, November 06, 2005 CET | From | New Daio Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty on the Keeping of Endangered Animals |
| Message | They can go bugger themselves. Law internationally should have little or no bearing on what we decide to make law here. |
| Date | 07:22:36, November 06, 2005 CET | From | Roman Imperialist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty on the Keeping of Endangered Animals |
| Message | Agreed. They have no right to try to make laws for us. |
| Date | 18:02:16, November 06, 2005 CET | From | People's Democratic Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty on the Keeping of Endangered Animals |
| Message | Well, "they" are not making laws for us, that's why we have to decide whether to ratify it or not. |
| Date | 01:31:10, November 07, 2005 CET | From | Labor Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty on the Keeping of Endangered Animals |
| Message | We agree with this Treaty |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 182 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 146 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 50 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
| Random quote: "Freedom is not worth having if it does not connote freedom to err." - Mahatma Gandhi |