We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Regulation Act for Scientific Research on Animals
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Conservative Party (ACN&IA)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2920
Description[?]:
| We should restrict the use of animals for research to make sure that animals do not come to harm in horrible ways. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research.
Old value:: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is unregulated.
Current: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Proposed: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in medical research.
Old value:: There are no restrictions on the use of animals for research.
Current: Animal research projects must apply for a license and submit to regulation.
Proposed: The use of animals in research is subject to basic regulations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:01:43, April 06, 2010 CET | From | Constitutionalist Imperial League (IA) | To | Debating the Regulation Act for Scientific Research on Animals |
| Message | Mr Speaker, The CIL is cold to this proposal on principle, because we prefer no government intervention is this area. However, we must note that this is not at all an important issue for the League. I yield. |
| Date | 22:29:41, April 06, 2010 CET | From | Imperial Monarchist Party | To | Debating the Regulation Act for Scientific Research on Animals |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We are like the CIL, but we do think that animals should not be tortured in any way. The problem is, corporations need test subjects. It is better to test on animals first and then humans to ensure that a product functions properly. We yield. |
| Date | 00:49:38, April 07, 2010 CET | From | Liberal Conservative Party (ACN&IA) | To | Debating the Regulation Act for Scientific Research on Animals |
| Message | Mr Speaker, We are not banning the use of product testing, merely restricting the rights to directly harm the animals in torturous ways. I yield. |
| Date | 10:18:45, April 07, 2010 CET | From | Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Regulation Act for Scientific Research on Animals |
| Message | Mr Speaker More regulation requires more funds. And more funds comes from tax payers. We will vote no on this "wasting's corner"! I yield |
| Date | 10:31:19, April 07, 2010 CET | From | Liberal Conservative Party (ACN&IA) | To | Debating the Regulation Act for Scientific Research on Animals |
| Message | Mr Speaker, We do not require more taxes, because when the universal tax bill has been passed, we will have a big revenue. To create these guidelines are not a very expensive regulation, either. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 108 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 92 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
| Random quote: "Any dictator would admire the uniformity and obedience of the US media." - Noam Chomsky |