Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5472
Next month in: 02:56:08
Server time: 05:03:51, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): albaniansunited | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Pacifists Fight Back

Details

Submitted by[?]: CNT/AFL

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2137

Description[?]:

No weapons at all.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:32:27, November 05, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the The Pacifists Fight Back
MessageOpposed to all.

Date10:47:34, November 05, 2005 CET
From National People's Gang
ToDebating the The Pacifists Fight Back
MessageSupport all

Date20:36:30, November 05, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the The Pacifists Fight Back
MessageWe can support everything except the first two articles.

Date05:22:59, November 06, 2005 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the The Pacifists Fight Back
MessageCould you maybe extend your support to 2? It really makes no sense to allow defence industries when no one is allowed weapons.

Date11:06:08, November 06, 2005 CET
FromBátory Dynastia
ToDebating the The Pacifists Fight Back
MessageThe police and army would have weapons, they just wouldn't allow them to be privately owned by the policemen and soldiers, I think.

Date18:00:20, November 06, 2005 CET
FromSlaytanic Wehrmacht
ToDebating the The Pacifists Fight Back
Messagesee #6: police doesn't have lethal weapons.

Date18:33:34, November 06, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the The Pacifists Fight Back
MessageThe problem with dismantling defence industries altogether is that if invaded, we may need them. But if you can remove article 1, we might be able to vote for the rest. We would have to introduce a social defence (non-violent/guerrila defence system involving conscription for training) to compensate if the bill passes, and if so we would hope for support from the parties backing this bill.

Date04:24:31, November 07, 2005 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the The Pacifists Fight Back
MessageHere goes.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 94

no
    

Total Seats: 206

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Particracy has 464 player slots.

    Random quote: "A conservative is a man who believes that nothing should be done for the first time." - Alfred E. Wiggam

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 99