Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5474
Next month in: 00:35:27
Server time: 19:24:32, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AethanKal | DanivonX | HopesFor | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Common Treasury: April 2136

Details

Submitted by[?]: National People's Gang

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2139

Description[?]:

Product generated by the communal application of toil to collective resources is shared by the community in its entirety.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:58:25, November 05, 2005 CET
FromInternational Society of Bankers
ToDebating the The Common Treasury: April 2136
MessageErr. No.

Date09:54:38, November 06, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the The Common Treasury: April 2136
MessageA few things. Without a finance ministry, how do you propose to collect this money in taxes. Also, the GDP is 159,477,323,011 LOD, how do you propose to spend 101% of this?

Any party that votes to spend money that doesnt exist is just stupid.

Date10:02:19, November 06, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the The Common Treasury: April 2136
MessageCollecting tax money isnt cheap, I might add.

Date18:38:17, November 06, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the The Common Treasury: April 2136
MessageKeynesian deficit financing is a valid strategy, as long as the deficits are balanced out by surpluses in other years, and can actually be a valuable spur to growth. However, we don't see any need for deficit financing at this time, and we don't agree with the spending increases.

Date23:45:11, November 06, 2005 CET
FromDemocractic Socialist Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the The Common Treasury: April 2136
MessageI will not support this.

However, if you give funds to the finance ministry and alter it not to create a deficit (possibly by taking money away from the defense ministry *cosmic hint*) you will have my vote.

p.s. gow does one create a budget proposal like this?

Date23:45:21, November 06, 2005 CET
FromDemocractic Socialist Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the The Common Treasury: April 2136
MessageI will not support this.

However, if you give funds to the finance ministry and alter it not to create a deficit (possibly by taking money away from the defense ministry *cosmic hint*) you will have my vote.

p.s. gow does one create a budget proposal like this?

Date04:21:48, November 07, 2005 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the The Common Treasury: April 2136
Message((type newspendingbill.php after the main/ part of the URL - I'm too lazy to get a proper link))

Date00:52:35, November 10, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the The Common Treasury: April 2136
MessageHere is the "deficit spending" you are proposing. That there is a 100% tax rate on all income in Lodamun, which will bring in 156,255,788,196 LOD, then you spend 161,000,000,000 LOD, and you still have a rather large deficit.

You simply cannot spend money that ISNT there. It's not a deficit, there is nowhere to borrow it from. It's spending more money than the Lodamun GDP. That is NOT keynsian in any way.
And then there is the problem of tax collection. How are you going to assess a 103% income tax on EVERY citizen of Lodamun without a dime devoted to finance?

This is idiocy at its worst.


Date02:32:02, November 10, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the The Common Treasury: April 2136
MessageMake no mistake, we strongly oppose this bill. However, it is certainly economically possible to borrow that amount of money from private lenders in Lodamun with invested income (not all money goes out as wages, much lies idle as savings or investments), or even abroad if we want to go into hock to the gnomes of Keymon. It's a dangerous and risky economic strategy which we oppose, and it goes beyond keynesian strategies with the taxation rate, but it's theoretically possible to implement. Lodamun just shouldn't implement it.

Date23:43:34, November 10, 2005 CET
From National People's Gang
ToDebating the The Common Treasury: April 2136
MessageNot a penny needs to be borrowed -

These spending limits are funded by Smiting the Evil of the Money God April 2136 -
http://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=28707

Bracket Tax Estimated Revenue
> 1 LOD 99% 163,129,000,000 LOD
Total 163,129,000,000 LOD

which leaves an excess of 2,129,000,000 LOD - plenty for a rainy day or emergency spending.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 37

no
      

Total Seats: 263

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Jelbic = "Group of cultures with an overall Central Asian/Eurasian steppe theme, using a fictional language developed specifically for Particracy".

    Random quote: "This administration is not sympathetic to corporations; it is indentured to corporations." - Ralph Nader

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 74