We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Sovreignty Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: New Aldurian Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2143
Description[?]:
| This bill will return control over gay marriage to the Aldurian government. |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the International Gay Rights treaty.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:33:53, November 06, 2005 CET | From | Market Socialist Party | To | Debating the National Sovreignty Act |
| Message | We will absolutely NOT support this bill. |
| Date | 15:44:30, November 06, 2005 CET | From | Aldurian Libertarian Socialist Party | To | Debating the National Sovreignty Act |
| Message | I never though the conservatives would like to ratify such a progressive treaty. We will agree. |
| Date | 15:45:26, November 06, 2005 CET | From | Aldurian Libertarian Socialist Party | To | Debating the National Sovreignty Act |
| Message | sorry, I'd just see that this is a withdrawal. Forget all that i've say. |
| Date | 17:10:30, November 06, 2005 CET | From | New Aldurian Conservative Party | To | Debating the National Sovreignty Act |
| Message | OOC: No problem. We all make nice little OOC blunders. It's why debates aren't factored into election results. |
| Date | 17:58:27, November 06, 2005 CET | From | Aldurian Moderates | To | Debating the National Sovreignty Act |
| Message | Sorry, I agree with anyone's right to join into a commited relationship. However, that relationship does not need the title of marriage. Regardless, if two individuals stay together for years, sharing their lives, their bills, their home..., then they earn the right to the same benefits that any other couple receive. This includes offical recognition through tax breaks, combined health insurance, deed/will rights and so forth. |
| Date | 16:48:49, November 19, 2005 CET | From | Aldurian Libertarian Socialist Party | To | Debating the National Sovreignty Act |
| Message | Also, we're talking of civil mariage contract. As for the word mariage, I don't think its a TM of the mainstream religious church. However, the law protected by the treaty will not forces religious institution to celebrate mariage incompatible with their beliefs. |
| Date | 23:29:36, November 19, 2005 CET | From | Jacobites | To | Debating the National Sovreignty Act |
| Message | This bill doesn't stop faggots from marrying, it just stops unelected foreign bodies making our decisions for us. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 173 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 228 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting. |
| Random quote: "Since when did you care about women?" - Faith Chiang, former Gaduri politician |