We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Adultery
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federal Constitutionalist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2929
Description[?]:
Why? Should be illegal |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to adultery.
Old value:: Adultery is legal.
Current: Adultery is illegal, but not prosecuted.
Proposed: Adultery is a capital offence.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:07:52, April 25, 2010 CET | From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Adultery |
Message | You've got to be bloody kidding... this isn't a medeival theocracy. You are a modern, conservative party. Not a Islamic, Christian fundamentalist wishing to kill those who make the choice of commiting adultery. |
Date | 02:50:20, April 26, 2010 CET | From | Rerum Novarum Party | To | Debating the Adultery |
Message | If capital punishment is outlawed, then abusers of this will serve time; which is fine since if marriage is going to be a contract of the state, the state should enforce violations of it. |
Date | 00:42:27, April 30, 2010 CET | From | Libertarian Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Adultery |
Message | If the state is going to give extra priveleges to those who sign "contracts" of marriage as opposed to those who just consider themselves married, then the state has no business enforcing violations of said contracts ... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 85 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 125 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "Prejudices subsist in people's imagination long after they have been destroyed by their experience." - Ernest Dimnet |