Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5474
Next month in: 01:28:07
Server time: 10:31:52, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): burgerboys | Dx6743 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of August 2136

Details

Submitted by[?]: Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2137

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:18:58, November 06, 2005 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2136
MessageNow it would appear that I have no choice but to share a cabinet with the socialists. It is therefore that I propose that rather than having three parties, in a situation of two against one, we rather switch to an equal footing and have one on one for balance.

Date07:38:41, November 06, 2005 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2136
MessageHaving had a proper look at the current cabinet, its also quite insulting that the third largest party, Praetor or no, has two of the big three portfolios while their "allies" (or perhaps the term bitch party would be more appropriate) are given chicken feed. Its highly unbalanced.

Date15:59:00, November 06, 2005 CET
From National Party of Baltusia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2136
MessageI trust the RSA will agree with me when I say this is merely an irritating attempt by the LibLibs to snatch more power from the current cabinet, and does not deserve the dignification of proper arguement against.

Date01:07:25, November 07, 2005 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2136
MessageIn other words, "I have no power in this cabinet! Boo hoo! Where's my mummy?"

Date13:06:08, November 07, 2005 CET
From National Party of Baltusia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2136
MessageIt seems only the LibLibs find this appealing. Out of touch, are we?

Date18:29:34, November 07, 2005 CET
FromRevolutionary Socialist Alliance
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2136
MessageIt seems to me like a tactical way of reducing left-wing positions. It may benefit my party at a glance, but it also means you get more power and cuts down a socialist majority in cabinet.

Date23:29:17, November 07, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic Socialists
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2136
MessageThis cabinet proposal is more appealing than the status quo; our 'no' vote is a procedural matter. We sincerely doubt that were the RSA familiar with the history of the ISP, they would still want to share power with them.

Date23:29:35, November 07, 2005 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2136
MessageActually socialists would hold 7/13 portfolios, if one includes the position of Praetor, which chairs the cabinet.

Date03:32:31, November 08, 2005 CET
FromOptimates Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2136
MessageJustice in the hands of socialists? Brr! Causes shivers up my right wing spine. Out of general principles I must oppose.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 94

no
     

Total Seats: 218

abstain
  

Total Seats: 21


Random fact: "Spamming", or the indiscriminate posting of unsolicited messages, is not allowed.

Random quote: "Hatred is not, and should never be considered as another form of freedom of expression." - Icarion Dadhelus, former Selucian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 65