We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Civil Defense Provisions Code of 2931
Details
Submitted by[?]: Libertad Movement
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2932
Description[?]:
| Defense provisions should not be left to the hands of local government, for when nuclear threats are to be encountered, it doesn't encompass a city or a satrapy alone, but rather large areas of land that could affect 2 or more satrapies, and we can't affort having a satrapy or a city alone that would not have defense provisions, for evacuation and such would entail greater efforts on cities or satrapies who have defense provisions and supplies that could only sustain their own regions. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Civil defence is the government's policy on providing shelters to be used in the event of attacks on major cities, mainly nuclear attacks and bombing.
Old value:: Local authorities are responsible for building and maintaining shelters.
Current: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Proposed: No new buildings may be constructed unless they feature provisions for civil defence.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes |
Total Seats: 71 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 178 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Never use the same password as a friend. If two or more active accounts use the same password, they will be inactivated. |
| Random quote: "The main problem of the left is that it has been traditionally divided and unable to reach agreements between different leftist views, whilst the right has almost always moved in the same direction by giving concessions to different rightist points of view." - Aelius Celer, former Selucian politician |