We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Civil rights reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Armed Jakanian National Front
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2934
Description[?]:
To ensure a strong government |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to adultery.
Old value:: There is no explicit government policy on adultery.
Current: There is no explicit government policy on adultery.
Proposed: Adultery is a capital offence.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign marriages.
Old value:: All foreign marriages are recognised, regardless of domestic policy regarding marriage.
Current: Only foreign marriages that comply with domestic policy regarding marriage are recognised.
Proposed: Only foreign marriages that comply with domestic policy regarding marriage are recognised.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government recognition of interracial marriages (if marriages are recognised).
Old value:: Mixed race marriages follow the same regulation as other marriages.
Current: Mixed race marriages follow the same regulation as other marriages.
Proposed: Any form of unofficial interracial marriage or civil union is banned.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Women's working rights.
Old value:: Women are entitled the same working rights as men.
Current: Women are entitled the same working rights as men.
Proposed: Women are only allowed to work in part time jobs.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:44:10, May 04, 2010 CET | From | Birleşik Demokrat Parti | To | Debating the Civil rights reform |
Message | Let us see if the PPJ stand by their word and oppose this Bill. |
Date | 17:50:53, May 04, 2010 CET | From | Armed Jakanian National Front | To | Debating the Civil rights reform |
Message | Let us see if the PPJ got balls |
Date | 18:05:03, May 04, 2010 CET | From | Republican Party of Jakania | To | Debating the Civil rights reform |
Message | Article 2 is absolutely sound, however, this is a bad bill all over. We'll propose our only family values bill any time. |
Date | 18:07:57, May 04, 2010 CET | From | Armed Jakanian National Front | To | Debating the Civil rights reform |
Message | The people show massive support of our effort to keep our clean and pure race free from the untermench |
Date | 18:10:51, May 04, 2010 CET | From | Socialist Peoples Party of Jakania | To | Debating the Civil rights reform |
Message | And to think the Progress Party actually invited these people into coalition government! The PPJ has a lot of questions to anwser. |
Date | 18:14:39, May 04, 2010 CET | From | Republican Party of Jakania | To | Debating the Civil rights reform |
Message | I've answered all possible questions. If you have any more, please fire away because we have nothing to do trying to recover an economy from a recession; governing a country and keeping our borders safe from terrorist activities. Matt Fitzgerald. Chairman of PPJ |
Date | 19:20:13, May 04, 2010 CET | From | Jakanian Liberal Party (JLP) | To | Debating the Civil rights reform |
Message | mr. nazipresident, have you ever got laid? |
Date | 20:15:25, May 04, 2010 CET | From | Armed Jakanian National Front | To | Debating the Civil rights reform |
Message | I would ask that the environmental Liberal Party behave during debates, and to make the facts clear I ask the ELPs leader to ask his sister if I have ever gotten laid, the answer might surprise you |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 250 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "Democracy means simply the bludgeoning of the people by the people for the people." - Oscar Wilde |