We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Resoultion: Parliamentary structure after the next election
Details
Submitted by[?]: Armed Jakanian National Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2934
Description[?]:
| To secure a strong government based on both the parliament and the government the NSWP asks the legislature to appoint two committes and one elected official. Elected official: Speaker of the house, the biggest party gets to appoint the speaker of the parliament Committes: Budget, a committe to ensure cooperation with regards to the national budget, members: Head of government, minister of finance, minister of speaker of the house, minister of trade and industry, one representative from the biggest opposition party Committes: Foreign affairs, this committe represents Jakania in international forums: Head of state, Head of government, minister of foreign affairs, speaker of the house, one representative from the biggest opposition party This bill becomes law after the next election |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:29:34, May 05, 2010 CET | From | Republican Party of Jakania | To | Debating the Resoultion: Parliamentary structure after the next election |
| Message | (OOC: I think this is going to be quite interesting, I've already used my quota for making party organizations, so I hope someone make a "Jakania Budget Committee" and a "Jakania Foreign Affairs Committee". Everyone should be able to be members, but not post, of course. It's nice that we get a boost to RP activity here.) |
| Date | 17:31:52, May 05, 2010 CET | From | Armed Jakanian National Front | To | Debating the Resoultion: Parliamentary structure after the next election |
| Message | To correct one error it should be speaker of the house not "minister of speaker of the house" |
| Date | 17:39:43, May 05, 2010 CET | From | Socialist Peoples Party of Jakania | To | Debating the Resoultion: Parliamentary structure after the next election |
| Message | Undemocratic to ignore all parties bar the largest two/government and offical oppositon. |
| Date | 17:42:37, May 05, 2010 CET | From | Armed Jakanian National Front | To | Debating the Resoultion: Parliamentary structure after the next election |
| Message | Well, Im always open to reform this bill, so feel free to propose another solution. But when it comes to foreign affairs the natural part in a negotiation is the government, this will actally give the opposition the right to be represented. |
| Date | 19:01:10, May 05, 2010 CET | From | Republican Party of Jakania | To | Debating the Resoultion: Parliamentary structure after the next election |
| Message | I think this is an important bill to secure more PR. Surely, the opposition has far less influence than the position, but that's natural. The opposition should unite as a coalition in some way and hence discuss what their representative will say, even though he is formally represented by the biggest oppositional party. There's really no reason why the opposition should have more representatives. They can do whatever they want in the Supreme Council, and of course can observe the discussions taking place in the given committees. We're never all going to agree on it, anyone might end up in opposition; but that's just life. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 142 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 108 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Make sure to check out Particracy's wiki. http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page |
| Random quote: "He who controls the past, commands the future. He who commands the future, conquers the past." - Kane; Command and Conquer: Red Alert |