We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Media Decency Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Labour Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2937
Description[?]:
Our Media needs to be regulated. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The time at which sexually explicit content may be shown on broadcast television (if allowed).
Old value:: Sexually explicit content may be shown all day long.
Current: Sexually explicit content or nudity may only be shown during hours that very few children watch television
Proposed: Sexually explicit content or nudity may only be shown during hours that very few children watch television
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding regulation of video games.
Old value:: The government does not regulate video games.
Current: The government maintains strict age limitation laws that require proof of age before sales of video games may be made.
Proposed: The government does not maintain laws as to age limitation for purchasing video games, although it does require a content rating to be clearly displayed on the box.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 11:07:49, May 10, 2010 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the National Media Decency Act |
Message | Mr Speaker, let us remind the House that, regards Article I, there are certain restrictions. Only those television channels that define themselves as adult entertainment channels may show sexually explicit content all day long. Mainstream channels must wait until the watershed of 9pm before being able to do so. Mr Speaker, let us not treat adults as children. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 239 | |||
no | Total Seats: 144 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 8 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "Anarchy stands for the liberation of the human mind from the domination of religion, the liberation of the human body from the domination of property, liberation from the shackles and restraints of government." - Emma Goldman |