We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Post Offices Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Capitalizt Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2137
Description[?]:
We want to incentivate competition among the Post Offices sector by shutting the nationalized agency. Competition should already be the reason for a good service to be released from private post offices, but if some of them is found to provide an embarrasingly low quality service to their customers, or some of them is trying to unite to monopolize the sector, it is of government discretion to regulate them. Let government act as an equally distant, mild referee over the market. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the post office
Old value:: There is a nationalised post office agency. Private post offices are allowed to exist but the services provided by them are regulated.
Current: Only private post agencies exist, and the services they provide are regulated.
Proposed: Only private post agencies exist, and the services they provide are regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:59:56, November 06, 2005 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the Post Offices Bill |
Message | We believe that tere should be a single post office company with others allowed to provide extra seperate services. We cannot support any bill which does not keep that true. |
Date | 20:30:01, November 06, 2005 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the Post Offices Bill |
Message | I tend to agree with that. |
Date | 20:31:56, November 06, 2005 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the Post Offices Bill |
Message | The bill I mean |
Date | 19:37:26, November 07, 2005 CET | From | Left Communist Party | To | Debating the Post Offices Bill |
Message | Building on the UB's statement, maybe a public-private franchising system could be a compromise. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes | Total Seats: 158 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 242 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The Real-Life Equivalents Index is a valuable resource for finding out the in-game equivalents of real-life cultures, languages, religions, people and places: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6731 |
Random quote: "All history has been a history of class struggles between dominated classes at various stages of social development." - Friedrich Engels |