We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Miltary Industry Nationalisation Act
Details
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2939
Description[?]:
This is a chance to create thousands of new jobs It will boost GDP, because instead of the taxpayers money going to a private business, it gives the taxpayer a chance to earn it back. Plus i don't like the fact that if we were war, we would have to rely on private companies to supply our defense, we aren't going to share the same interests. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Current: The state owns all defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:20:54, May 16, 2010 CET | From | NCPA | To | Debating the Miltary Industry Nationalisation Act |
Message | just to make the last statement "we aren't going to share the same interests" in a war situation Alorian Interest : Defend Private interest: Monetary Gain Imagine if we run out of tanks, they could set the price and it would be completely out of our control |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 443 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 70 | ||||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 102 |
Random fact: Parties have the ability to endorse another party's candidate for the Head of State election (if there is one). This adds a strategic element to the elections. |
Random quote: "Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person." - Mother Teresa |