Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5471
Next month in: 02:32:52
Server time: 09:27:07, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Civil Liberties Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Sosialistisk Venstreparti

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2939

Description[?]:

The death penalty is barbaric, uncivilised and has been shown not to work as a deterrent. ID cards are expensive, unnecessary and an intrusion of peoples civil liberties.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:32:15, May 16, 2010 CET
FromFremskrittspartiet av Kazulia
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Act
MessageWell, I believe Article 1 is fine as it is now - how can it be a violation of civil rights if no one is forced to do it? And of course they are not free, so we do not lose money.

I would gladly vote for changing Article 2 on the condition that life sentences are possible for major / violent crimes.

So I must vote no for now.

Date17:56:11, May 16, 2010 CET
FromSosialistisk Venstreparti
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Act
MessageWe would support life sentences however believe everyone should have the chance to be released after a certain time if they no longer pose a danger to the public. We feel having an ID card system in place can be costly and unnecessary even if people themselves have to pay for them and also fear that even a voluntary system is open to abuse and can potentially constitute a slippery slope towards unwanted intrusion into people's private lives.

Date22:28:53, May 16, 2010 CET
FromMitten Partiet
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Act
MessageWe would not support Article 2. We think that we should have that opportune in law. It's not man A how muded 1 person in car we are talking about, that we are talking about is terrorist or murderousness as have murderer more then 7 persons in most chases. We are talking about dictators as have murded many hundreds.

Date22:31:28, May 16, 2010 CET
FromMitten Partiet
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Act
Messageon A:1 we do not agree as it's on voluntary basis your are not required to carry them. But sometimes like then you want to take out money from a bank inside it you must have it for security reasons.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 324

no
  

Total Seats: 426

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated.

    Random quote: "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, from those who are cold and are not clothed. The world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children." - Dwight D. Eisenhower

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 60