We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Service Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Paleofederalist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2940
Description[?]:
If you love your country you will defend it. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National service.
Old value:: There shall be no mandatory military or civilian national service.
Current: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve a term in the military.
Proposed: All adults upon completion of schooling can be required in times of war to serve a term in the military.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:48:40, May 16, 2010 CET | From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Service Act |
Message | ...and if they don't love their country? |
Date | 23:32:01, May 16, 2010 CET | From | Rerum Novarum Party | To | Debating the Service Act |
Message | Then they can either request a service job in a specific field. Why are they in a country they don't love anyways? |
Date | 03:49:43, May 17, 2010 CET | From | Libertarian Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Service Act |
Message | Maybe because they were born there ... And besides, loving you're country and always support the actions of its goverment are two different things, I know thats hard for a fascist to understand ... |
Date | 03:54:07, May 17, 2010 CET | From | Libertarian Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Service Act |
Message | What if a person disagrees with the current millitary regime the nation is engaging in? I guess you're would be that the government knows better whether or not a military regime is good or not, and therefore the opinion of anyone who doesn't want to serve in this regime should be ignored, they should just be forced to serve. |
Date | 03:54:36, May 17, 2010 CET | From | Libertarian Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Service Act |
Message | I guess you're answer ... |
Date | 07:11:24, May 17, 2010 CET | From | Rerum Novarum Party | To | Debating the Service Act |
Message | If they don't want to serve in times to protect their hometowns, they must not care for their hometowns. If that is the case, they can move elsewhere; we are not preventing them as such. |
Date | 12:07:03, May 17, 2010 CET | From | Libertarian Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Service Act |
Message | Who says the current regime the government is engaging in does absolutely anything to help protect their hometown? |
Date | 14:58:46, May 17, 2010 CET | From | Rerum Novarum Party | To | Debating the Service Act |
Message | With bases constructed throughout the nation, and a non-interventionist policy, the current 'regime' has it set about in the best format in years for every hometown to be protected. |
Date | 21:08:36, May 17, 2010 CET | From | Libertarian Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Service Act |
Message | The thing is, that non-interventionist policy could change at any moment. And besides, people should not be forced to protect anything. The government does not have a right to the nation's land, because it does not own the property that makes up the nation, the people do. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 101 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 91 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 23 |
Random fact: It is the collective responsibility of the players in a nation to ensure all currently binding RP laws are clearly outlined in an OOC reference bill in the "Bills under debate" section of the nation page. Confusion should not be created by displaying only some of the current RP laws or displaying RP laws which are no longer current. |
Random quote: "How can you govern a country which has 246 varieties of cheese?" Charles De Gaulle, "Les Mots du General |