Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5472
Next month in: 02:05:37
Server time: 13:54:22, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Mbites2 | sasho_metula | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Service Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Paleofederalist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2940

Description[?]:

If you love your country you will defend it.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:48:40, May 16, 2010 CET
FromCommunist Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Service Act
Message...and if they don't love their country?

Date23:32:01, May 16, 2010 CET
FromRerum Novarum Party
ToDebating the Service Act
MessageThen they can either request a service job in a specific field. Why are they in a country they don't love anyways?

Date03:49:43, May 17, 2010 CET
FromLibertarian Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Service Act
MessageMaybe because they were born there ... And besides, loving you're country and always support the actions of its goverment are two different things, I know thats hard for a fascist to understand ...

Date03:54:07, May 17, 2010 CET
FromLibertarian Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Service Act
MessageWhat if a person disagrees with the current millitary regime the nation is engaging in? I guess you're would be that the government knows better whether or not a military regime is good or not, and therefore the opinion of anyone who doesn't want to serve in this regime should be ignored, they should just be forced to serve.

Date03:54:36, May 17, 2010 CET
FromLibertarian Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Service Act
MessageI guess you're answer ...

Date07:11:24, May 17, 2010 CET
FromRerum Novarum Party
ToDebating the Service Act
MessageIf they don't want to serve in times to protect their hometowns, they must not care for their hometowns. If that is the case, they can move elsewhere; we are not preventing them as such.

Date12:07:03, May 17, 2010 CET
FromLibertarian Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Service Act
MessageWho says the current regime the government is engaging in does absolutely anything to help protect their hometown?

Date14:58:46, May 17, 2010 CET
FromRerum Novarum Party
ToDebating the Service Act
MessageWith bases constructed throughout the nation, and a non-interventionist policy, the current 'regime' has it set about in the best format in years for every hometown to be protected.

Date21:08:36, May 17, 2010 CET
FromLibertarian Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Service Act
MessageThe thing is, that non-interventionist policy could change at any moment. And besides, people should not be forced to protect anything. The government does not have a right to the nation's land, because it does not own the property that makes up the nation, the people do.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 101

no
   

Total Seats: 91

abstain
 

Total Seats: 23


Random fact: It is the collective responsibility of the players in a nation to ensure all currently binding RP laws are clearly outlined in an OOC reference bill in the "Bills under debate" section of the nation page. Confusion should not be created by displaying only some of the current RP laws or displaying RP laws which are no longer current.

Random quote: "How can you govern a country which has 246 varieties of cheese?" Charles De Gaulle, "Les Mots du General

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 60