Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 4410
Next month in: 00:47:09
Server time: 15:12:50, June 18, 2018 CET
Currently online (13): chrisfranz | EdmundSB | Iclande | KarcsayFerenc | Lorenzo Silva | Nafiz Cheb | Nafiz Mollah | Nicholas22222 | Rial Swift | RIS | Shibirikusu | TheUnicorn. | Versi | Record: 63 on 23:28:53, August 06, 2007 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Protect our Children Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Paleofederalist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2940

Description[?]:

We wish to uphold our cherished Right to Free Speech by vigorously enforcing our laws against obscenity to maintain a degree of separation between that which is truly speech and that which only seeks to distort and destroy.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:59:28, May 16, 2010 CET
FromCommunist Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Protect our Children Act
MessageWe agree with artcile 2 but not article 1:

If it is after the watershed, why on earth shouldn't programme makers be allowed to show adult content. It surely is up to the parents to make sure their children aren't watching things they believe to be inapropiate, rather than the programme makers.

Date01:16:54, May 17, 2010 CET
FromChristian Conservative Party
ToDebating the Protect our Children Act
MessageUnless, of course, the content is not appropriate for even those parents to decide.

Date03:56:27, May 17, 2010 CET
FromLibertarian Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Protect our Children Act
Message"We wish to uphold our cherished Right to Free Speech by vigorously enforcing our laws against obscenity to maintain a degree of separation between that which is truly speech and that which only seeks to distort and destroy."

hahahahahahahah, and who exactly gets to decide what is free speech and what is just attempting to distort and destroy, I guess that would be you woudn't it.

Date07:16:06, May 17, 2010 CET
FromRerum Novarum Party
ToDebating the Protect our Children Act
MessageThe right to freedom of speech is a corrupted ideal that is used as a shroud to ignorance.

Date03:24:26, May 18, 2010 CET
FromLibertarian Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Protect our Children Act
MessageI'm guessing that was a satirical statement?

Date12:13:56, May 18, 2010 CET
FromCommunist Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Protect our Children Act
Message^^No, his party doesn't belive in the "rights system".

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 101

no
   

Total Seats: 91

abstain
 

Total Seats: 23


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "I am working for the time when unqualified blacks, browns, and women join the unqualified men in running our government." - Cissy Farenthold

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 67