We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Protect our Children Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Paleofederalist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2940
Description[?]:
We wish to uphold our cherished Right to Free Speech by vigorously enforcing our laws against obscenity to maintain a degree of separation between that which is truly speech and that which only seeks to distort and destroy. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding sexually explicit material on broadcast television.
Old value:: Sexually explicit material is allowed, but violent or hard core pornography is banned.
Current: Sexually explicit material is not allowed, but nudity that is not sexually explicit is.
Proposed: Sexually explicit material is not allowed, but nudity that is not sexually explicit is.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The time at which sexually explicit content may be shown on broadcast television (if allowed).
Old value:: Sexually explicit content may only be shown during hours that very few children watch. Nudity may be shown all day long.
Current: Sexually explicit content or nudity may only be shown during hours that very few children watch television
Proposed: Sexually explicit content or nudity may only be shown during hours that very few children watch television
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:59:28, May 16, 2010 CET | From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Protect our Children Act |
Message | We agree with artcile 2 but not article 1: If it is after the watershed, why on earth shouldn't programme makers be allowed to show adult content. It surely is up to the parents to make sure their children aren't watching things they believe to be inapropiate, rather than the programme makers. |
Date | 01:16:54, May 17, 2010 CET | From | Christian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Protect our Children Act |
Message | Unless, of course, the content is not appropriate for even those parents to decide. |
Date | 03:56:27, May 17, 2010 CET | From | Libertarian Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Protect our Children Act |
Message | "We wish to uphold our cherished Right to Free Speech by vigorously enforcing our laws against obscenity to maintain a degree of separation between that which is truly speech and that which only seeks to distort and destroy." hahahahahahahah, and who exactly gets to decide what is free speech and what is just attempting to distort and destroy, I guess that would be you woudn't it. |
Date | 07:16:06, May 17, 2010 CET | From | Rerum Novarum Party | To | Debating the Protect our Children Act |
Message | The right to freedom of speech is a corrupted ideal that is used as a shroud to ignorance. |
Date | 03:24:26, May 18, 2010 CET | From | Libertarian Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Protect our Children Act |
Message | I'm guessing that was a satirical statement? |
Date | 12:13:56, May 18, 2010 CET | From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Protect our Children Act |
Message | ^^No, his party doesn't belive in the "rights system". |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 101 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 91 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 23 |
Random fact: If you have a question, post it on the forum. Game Moderators and other players will be happy to help you. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
Random quote: "If God made man they say Sam Colt made them equal." - Unknown |