We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Public Saftey Act 2939
Details
Submitted by[?]: New Aloria Party (NAP)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2940
Description[?]:
| We respectfully ask that Federal Congress members please support and pass this bill. Without this law in tact protests may turn into riots, muggings and innocent people may die. If law enforcement starts to see that the crowd is going to cause public safety risk, than they will be allowed to disperse the crowd PEACEFULLY not using riot gear, rubber bullets etc. We do not believe in that, that would just cause a riot. We believe it is important that the people have their voice heard but not if they are going to start a riot. Innocent people, children, elders may be killed. Are we going to risk the life’s of people so they can just stay out their and never have to leave? Thank you, People’s Party |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The citizens' right to assemble in public.
Old value:: There are no restrictions on the right of citizens to assemble in groups.
Current: The police may only disperse a crowd if a state of emergency has been declared.
Proposed: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:57:45, May 17, 2010 CET | From | New Aloria Party (NAP) | To | Debating the Public Saftey Act 2939 |
| Message | NSP, FDP: You voted no to on the SA's bill to bring the current law into place, now that I propose a bill to change it back to the former law that you voted to keep in effect when the SA tried to change it in this bill: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=290521 Please calirfy why you changed your vote? Thank you. |
| Date | 23:32:45, May 17, 2010 CET | From | New Aloria Party (NAP) | To | Debating the Public Saftey Act 2939 |
| Message | As well NSP you voted to bring into law that the current law we are porposing right now. See: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=287600 |
| Date | 02:07:44, May 18, 2010 CET | From | National Socialist Party (PCA) | To | Debating the Public Saftey Act 2939 |
| Message | No problem, and I should have clarified the change of policy at the start. We believe that the proposed law could be abused for unjust reasons, and therefore be a huge freedom violation. However, there are such laws in effect that would allow the police to disperse a group if it were to be acting violent (such as pulling out a gun, abusing other civilians, etc). |
| Date | 03:50:28, May 18, 2010 CET | From | New Aloria Party (NAP) | To | Debating the Public Saftey Act 2939 |
| Message | What laws currently in effect do so |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 290 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 325 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: All role-play must respect the established cultural background in Culturally Protected nations. |
| Random quote: "Even when laws have been written down, they ought not always to remain unaltered." - Aristotle |