Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 00:38:09
Server time: 19:21:50, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): Dx6743 | HopesFor | LC73DunMHP | Paulo Nogueira | RogueALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of March 2137

Details

Submitted by[?]: Tuesday Is Coming

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2140

Description[?]:

Giving it a shot:

FR
5
GA
2
LM
1
CS
1
PCL
1
Devo
1
CNT
1
DSP
1

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:13:40, November 07, 2005 CET
FromSlaytanic Wehrmacht
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2137
MessageDepending on wether other parties will support this or not, we might actually accept being the HoG

Date17:17:31, November 07, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2137
MessageWhile we appreciate Remnants support, we are unable to serve in a cabinet with any party proposing to take away rights from lesbian and gay citizens. Therefore we must regretfully the offer of two seats in this cabinet.

Date19:10:00, November 07, 2005 CET
FromInternational Society of Bankers
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2137
MessageWe will not support in order to remain HoG.

Date21:54:10, November 07, 2005 CET
From National People's Gang
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2137
MessageWe do not wish to serve in this cabinet.

Date03:18:46, November 08, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2137
MessageI request that another party proposes the cabinet, in that case. We prefer finance, but apprently such a department gives us control over gays and lesbians in some secretive manner.

Date18:50:48, November 08, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2137
MessageApologies, our objection has been misunderstood. So long as the Remnants are trying to take away rights from our lesbian and gay citizens, we will not take any part in any cabinet that includes tham in any way. If the Remnants are in government, and continue their campaigns of homophobia, then we will have to serve in opposition, and continue to make such deals with the Remnants as can be negotiated. This does not mean we do not appreciate Remnants support in the recent election, but equality for people of all sexual orientatations is a matter of basic principle, one of the few matters on which we are not willing to compromise. That is why we turned our back on the Remnants when they first began to propose bills based on homophobia -- we stand by our statement at that time that we cannot be in the same cabinet as them.

So there's three options we can see:
(1) The Remnants stop proposing the homophobic bills
(2) A cabinet of Remnants plus Libertarians plus one or more other parties, in which case we go into opposition
(3) A cabinet of other parties excluding the Remnants, such as we have now.

Date19:32:27, November 08, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2137
MessageOur attempts to eradicate gays and lesbians have proven to be less than popular among many, thus we have moved on and are simply attempting to regulate them. Surely one who can support regulation of "evil businesses" as you have done in the past, can see the need to regulate those who practice deviant lifestyles?

In any case, the President-Councillor need not worry, as she enjoys executive immunity.

Date02:25:24, November 09, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2137
MessageExecutive immunity? The President-Councillor has searched the extensive files passed along to her by her late predecessor and finds no record of any such status. As far as she can tell, the President-Councillor's only power is the awesome ability to cut ribbons faster than ordinary people.

Date02:48:37, November 09, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2137
MessageWe assumed that Lodamun, like many/most nations, gave their head of state the power to pardon criminals and excused a Head of State's minor crimes.

Date03:55:41, November 12, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2137
MessageAs this would produce too many empty spots, we will vote against in favor of a new one.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 33

no
       

Total Seats: 233

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost.

    Random quote: "If voting changed anything, they'd abolish it." - Ken Livingstone

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 81