We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: An act to amend the Proposal Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Buidheann Saorsa
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2942
Description[?]:
50 is far, far too many. Parties have been wasting the time of the legislative assembly with its over stacked bills and ridiculous manifestos. This legislature is no place for your manifestos. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The number of proposals a party can introduce per year (will be handed out as a monthly quota).
Old value:: 15
Current: 20
Proposed: 5
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The maximum proposal quota a party can accumulate.
Old value:: 50
Current: 10
Proposed: 15
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:26:54, May 21, 2010 CET | From | Libertarian Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the An act to amend the Proposal Act |
Message | I support article 1. |
Date | 20:20:52, May 21, 2010 CET | From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the An act to amend the Proposal Act |
Message | You don't understand. Manifestos are passed, not in the hope that they pass, but so that your politcal positions are clearer and they are the way YOU want them to. Voting and introducing proposals are the only way to get the votes in elections of the people YOU want. |
Date | 21:15:51, May 21, 2010 CET | From | Buidheann Saorsa | To | Debating the An act to amend the Proposal Act |
Message | I understand. It is the CPD that does not understand that manifestos are a waste of the time of this assembly. |
Date | 02:45:19, May 22, 2010 CET | From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the An act to amend the Proposal Act |
Message | So we are no longer allowed to "waste" our own time to make our political positions the way we want them because of you fascists? And don;t say it isn't fascist, because it is. It is limiting democracy. |
Date | 02:46:38, May 22, 2010 CET | From | Federal Constitutionalist Party | To | Debating the An act to amend the Proposal Act |
Message | This is a great idea. |
Date | 02:50:19, May 22, 2010 CET | From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the An act to amend the Proposal Act |
Message | Do you even know how the political position meter works in this game? If you introduce bills that you want, then the meter changes the way you want it. This is a way of implementing your fascist regime! The country is good enough the way you want it, so you are trying to limit the powers of other parties by stopping them passing laws. Fascists! The CPD will not stand for such tyranny in an already pretty undemocratic nation. |
Date | 02:51:06, May 22, 2010 CET | From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the An act to amend the Proposal Act |
Message | Those who vote in favour of this should be hung from the neck until they are dead for treason. |
Date | 02:54:00, May 22, 2010 CET | From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the An act to amend the Proposal Act |
Message | OOC: ITS A GAME! WE'RE NOT WASTING YOUR TIME AT ALL. WE ARE USING OUR MANIFESTOS TO MAKE THE POLITICAL POSTIONS CHANGE, NOT SO IT CAN PASS! THE POLITICAL METER JUDGES HOW MANY VOTES YOU GET AT THE ELECTION. If this passes, I am going to break the rule on no cursing or swearing. If you are going to try and limit my democracy, I am going to show you I will not back down to your fascist regime. |
Date | 06:29:31, May 22, 2010 CET | From | Christian Conservative Party | To | Debating the An act to amend the Proposal Act |
Message | We fascists are in favour of this fascist regime. Fascist. And just because we fascists don't think fascist was said enough... fascist. |
Date | 12:42:01, May 22, 2010 CET | From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the An act to amend the Proposal Act |
Message | Why could you possibly be in favour of this? |
Date | 14:20:43, May 22, 2010 CET | From | Narik Nationalestik Parti | To | Debating the An act to amend the Proposal Act |
Message | CPD, communism is not quite democratic.. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 125 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 28 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 62 |
Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI). |
Random quote: "We here thank those in Deltaria who put [Zardic spy Mona Rivet] to justice in the most humane way possible. With bullets." - Sergio Rodriguez, former Egelian journalist |